Institutional resilience and land-acquisition governance: Participation and conflict-management mechanisms in the Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway project

This study examines governance performance during infrastructure land acquisition and the role of institutional resilience in supporting implementation. Using survey data from 108 public-sector implementers involved in the Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway project in Indonesia, the relationships among institutional resilience capacities, participatory governance, conflict-management mechanisms, and governance performance were analyzed using PLS-SEM. Learning capacity and adaptive capacity were positively related to participatory governance, while buffering capacity was positively related to conflict-management mechanisms. Participatory governance showed no direct relationship with governance performance but its indirect relationship through conflict-management mechanisms was statistically significant. Buffering capacity and adaptive capacity were positively related to governance performance, while learning capacity showed no significant relationship. The findings reveal differentiated governance roles across resilience capacities and distinguish direct capacity–performance relationships from process-based relationships involving stakeholder participation and conflict-management mechanisms. In conflict-prone land acquisition, conflict-management mechanisms emerged as an important governance process linking stakeholder participation with governance performance. The study shows how different resilience capacities support different governance functions during land-acquisition implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108379
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional resilience and land-acquisition governance: Participation and conflict-management mechanisms in the Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway project

Meinanda Kurniawan, Rora Puspita Sari, Yudi Azis, Shanshan Lu
Land Use Policy
Land Rights and Reforms
article

Institutional resilience and land-acquisition governance: Participation and conflict-management mechanisms in the Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway project

Meinanda Kurniawan, Rora Puspita Sari, Yudi Azis, Shanshan Lu
article en

Abstract

This study examines governance performance during infrastructure land acquisition and the role of institutional resilience in supporting implementation. Using survey data from 108 public-sector implementers involved in the Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway project in Indonesia, the relationships among institutional resilience capacities, participatory governance, conflict-management mechanisms, and governance performance were analyzed using PLS-SEM. Learning capacity and adaptive capacity were positively related to participatory governance, while buffering capacity was positively related to conflict-management mechanisms. Participatory governance showed no direct relationship with governance performance but its indirect relationship through conflict-management mechanisms was statistically significant. Buffering capacity and adaptive capacity were positively related to governance performance, while learning capacity showed no significant relationship. The findings reveal differentiated governance roles across resilience capacities and distinguish direct capacity–performance relationships from process-based relationships involving stakeholder participation and conflict-management mechanisms. In conflict-prone land acquisition, conflict-management mechanisms emerged as an important governance process linking stakeholder participation with governance performance. The study shows how different resilience capacities support different governance functions during land-acquisition implementation.

Land Use PolicyVol. 173
Padjadjaran University (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Sustainable cities and communities, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.