Predictors, moderators and mediators of psychosocial treatment outcomes in borderline personality disorder: a systematic review (part I - patient related factors)

Abstract Background The most recent systematic review of predictors of treatment response in borderline personality disorder (BPD) was conducted in 2012. Since that time several new studies have been conducted and so the objective of this review is to conduct a more current systematic review of predictors, mediators and moderators of psychosocial treatment outcomes for individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psychinfo, Web of Science and CINAHL were systematically searched for articles outlining the effects of psychosocial treatments for individuals diagnosed with BPD across treatment modalities. Studies in which the only treatment was pharmacological were excluded. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Articles reporting the effect of predictors, moderators, mediators on psychosocial treatment outcomes in this population were synthesized. Results This search identified 18,973 unique articles of which 311 studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Due to the large number of articles identified, studies of patient-related predictors are reported here, while studies of treatment-related predictors will be reported in a subsequent paper. Demographic variables (ex: age, gender, education, employment) as well as co-morbid mental health conditions (substance use disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders) appeared not to be associated with change in BPD symptoms or drop out. Findings with regards to BPD symptoms at baseline as a predictor of change in BPD symptoms at follow up were mixed. Mindful “non-judging” and emotion regulation showed promise as predictors and mediators of improvement in BPD symptoms. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to the heterogeneity of methodologies used in the studies. Conclusion The current review identified several key variables that are unlikely to be predictors of outcome across treatments for individuals with BPD. Many studies in the review examined unique predictor-outcome pairs resulting in little replication. Further replication and identification of predictors may aid in refinement of treatment development and implementation for this population. Trial registration Pre-registered March 2020 in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020173948).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-08761-z
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors, moderators and mediators of psychosocial treatment outcomes in borderline personality disorder: a systematic review (part I - patient related factors)

Anne K. I. Sonley, Richard J. Zeifman, Enoch Lam, Jeanette Hui et al.
BMC Psychiatry
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Predictors, moderators and mediators of psychosocial treatment outcomes in borderline personality disorder: a systematic review (part I - patient related factors)

Anne K. I. Sonley, Richard J. Zeifman, Enoch Lam, Jeanette Hui, Shelley McMain, Beverley Katherine Fredborg, Erica Foronda, Sarah Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The most recent systematic review of predictors of treatment response in borderline personality disorder (BPD) was conducted in 2012. Since that time several new studies have been conducted and so the objective of this review is to conduct a more current systematic review of predictors, mediators and moderators of psychosocial treatment outcomes for individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psychinfo, Web of Science and CINAHL were systematically searched for articles outlining the effects of psychosocial treatments for individuals diagnosed with BPD across treatment modalities. Studies in which the only treatment was pharmacological were excluded. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Articles reporting the effect of predictors, moderators, mediators on psychosocial treatment outcomes in this population were synthesized. Results This search identified 18,973 unique articles of which 311 studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Due to the large number of articles identified, studies of patient-related predictors are reported here, while studies of treatment-related predictors will be reported in a subsequent paper. Demographic variables (ex: age, gender, education, employment) as well as co-morbid mental health conditions (substance use disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders) appeared not to be associated with change in BPD symptoms or drop out. Findings with regards to BPD symptoms at baseline as a predictor of change in BPD symptoms at follow up were mixed. Mindful “non-judging” and emotion regulation showed promise as predictors and mediators of improvement in BPD symptoms. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to the heterogeneity of methodologies used in the studies. Conclusion The current review identified several key variables that are unlikely to be predictors of outcome across treatments for individuals with BPD. Many studies in the review examined unique predictor-outcome pairs resulting in little replication. Further replication and identification of predictors may aid in refinement of treatment development and implementation for this population. Trial registration Pre-registered March 2020 in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020173948).

BMC Psychiatry
The New School (US), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Imperial College London (GB), New York University (US), The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.