Association of Adjuvant Radiotherapy De‐Escalation With Outcomes Following Oncoplastic Breast‐Conserving Surgery

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery reduces local recurrence but can introduce reconstructive morbidity. Although recent trials support the safe omission of RT in selected patients, its impact on surgical and patient-reported outcomes following oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) remains poorly defined. We evaluated surgical and long-term patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing OPBCS, stratified by receipt of RT. METHODS: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent OPBCS between 2017 and 2024 for stage 0-3 breast cancer. Patients were stratified based on receipt of RT. Postoperative complications, unplanned reoperation, and revision procedures were compared between cohorts. Long-term patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the validated BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the independent association between RT status and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 257 patients; 210 patients received RT (81.7%) and 47 underwent RT de-escalation (18.3%). Surgical site infection (p = 0.100), delayed wound healing (p = 0.300), and skin flap necrosis rates (p = 0.0300) were similar between cohorts. Seroma (30% vs. 13%; p = 0.006) and unplanned reoperation (21% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.006) were more frequent with RT omission. Patients who did not receive RT demonstrated significantly higher mean Satisfaction with Breasts scores compared with those who received RT (57 ± 25 vs. 23 ± 24; p = 0.001). In adjusted models, RT de-escalation was associated with a 36-point increase in Satisfaction with Breasts scores (β = 36.0; 95% CI, 18.0-54.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RT omission was independently associated with higher patient-reported satisfaction with breasts, though patients had higher seroma and reoperation rates. These data support balanced shared decision-making for RT de-escalation in appropriately selected patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70425
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of Adjuvant Radiotherapy De‐Escalation With Outcomes Following Oncoplastic Breast‐Conserving Surgery

Ravinder Bamba, Richard Jason VonDerHaar, Aladdin H. Hassanein, Ivan Hadad et al.
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Association of Adjuvant Radiotherapy De‐Escalation With Outcomes Following Oncoplastic Breast‐Conserving Surgery

Ravinder Bamba, Richard Jason VonDerHaar, Aladdin H. Hassanein, Ivan Hadad, Rachel M. Danforth, Mary E. Lester, Carla Suzanne Fisher, Abbas M. Hassan, Carson J. Park, Kathryn Borders
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery reduces local recurrence but can introduce reconstructive morbidity. Although recent trials support the safe omission of RT in selected patients, its impact on surgical and patient-reported outcomes following oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) remains poorly defined. We evaluated surgical and long-term patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing OPBCS, stratified by receipt of RT. METHODS: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients who underwent OPBCS between 2017 and 2024 for stage 0-3 breast cancer. Patients were stratified based on receipt of RT. Postoperative complications, unplanned reoperation, and revision procedures were compared between cohorts. Long-term patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the validated BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the independent association between RT status and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 257 patients; 210 patients received RT (81.7%) and 47 underwent RT de-escalation (18.3%). Surgical site infection (p = 0.100), delayed wound healing (p = 0.300), and skin flap necrosis rates (p = 0.0300) were similar between cohorts. Seroma (30% vs. 13%; p = 0.006) and unplanned reoperation (21% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.006) were more frequent with RT omission. Patients who did not receive RT demonstrated significantly higher mean Satisfaction with Breasts scores compared with those who received RT (57 ± 25 vs. 23 ± 24; p = 0.001). In adjusted models, RT de-escalation was associated with a 36-point increase in Satisfaction with Breasts scores (β = 36.0; 95% CI, 18.0-54.0; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RT omission was independently associated with higher patient-reported satisfaction with breasts, though patients had higher seroma and reoperation rates. These data support balanced shared decision-making for RT de-escalation in appropriately selected patients.

Journal of Surgical Oncology
Indiana University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.