Clinical examination findings were not associated with isometric strength or functional performance in adults with groin pain

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether positive clinical examination findings were associated with selected measures of lower-limb isometric strength or functional performance in physically active adults with groin pain. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational and exploratory study with blinded outcome assessment. A total of 37 physically active adults (18-45 years) with clinically diagnosed groin pain (≥ 6 weeks) underwent standardised orthopaedic testing (flexion, abduction and external rotation [FABER]; flexion, adduction and internal rotation [FADIR]; scour; squeeze), targeted palpation (adductors, pubic symphysis), isometric hip and knee strength testing using a handheld dynamometer and functional performance tests (modified Star Excursion Balance Test [mSEBT], cross-over hop). Associations between clinical findings and strength/performance measures were analysed using adjusted binary logistic regression models controlling for age, body mass index and height, with false discovery rate correction. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated broadly similar right- and left-side performance in the mSEBT and cross-over hop tests, with strength ratios close to 1.0. Positive clinical examination findings were common, particularly for left adductor-region palpation (74.3% of valid observations) and the left FABER test (70.3%). After adjustment for multiple comparisons, no significant associations were found between positive clinical tests and functional or strength measures. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory sample of physically active adults with groin pain, positive orthopaedic and palpation tests were not significantly associated with deficits in dynamic balance or isometric strength. These findings are limited to the selected isometric and general functional measures and reinforce the importance of a multi-modal assessment that incorporates clinical classification, eccentric adductor strength testing and sport-specific functional evaluations to guide rehabilitation and return-to-sport decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-026-00971-1
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical examination findings were not associated with isometric strength or functional performance in adults with groin pain

Filippo Migliorini, Tamiris Beppler Martins, Nicola Maffulli, Rodrigo Okubo et al.
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Clinical examination findings were not associated with isometric strength or functional performance in adults with groin pain

Filippo Migliorini, Tamiris Beppler Martins, Nicola Maffulli, Rodrigo Okubo, Alan Immich, Matheus Oliveira Branco, Guilherme Vinicius da Costa, Kaue Bertoto Dutra, Vitor Mateus Madruga de Sousa
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether positive clinical examination findings were associated with selected measures of lower-limb isometric strength or functional performance in physically active adults with groin pain. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, observational and exploratory study with blinded outcome assessment. A total of 37 physically active adults (18-45 years) with clinically diagnosed groin pain (≥ 6 weeks) underwent standardised orthopaedic testing (flexion, abduction and external rotation [FABER]; flexion, adduction and internal rotation [FADIR]; scour; squeeze), targeted palpation (adductors, pubic symphysis), isometric hip and knee strength testing using a handheld dynamometer and functional performance tests (modified Star Excursion Balance Test [mSEBT], cross-over hop). Associations between clinical findings and strength/performance measures were analysed using adjusted binary logistic regression models controlling for age, body mass index and height, with false discovery rate correction. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated broadly similar right- and left-side performance in the mSEBT and cross-over hop tests, with strength ratios close to 1.0. Positive clinical examination findings were common, particularly for left adductor-region palpation (74.3% of valid observations) and the left FABER test (70.3%). After adjustment for multiple comparisons, no significant associations were found between positive clinical tests and functional or strength measures. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory sample of physically active adults with groin pain, positive orthopaedic and palpation tests were not significantly associated with deficits in dynamic balance or isometric strength. These findings are limited to the selected isometric and general functional measures and reinforce the importance of a multi-modal assessment that incorporates clinical classification, eccentric adductor strength testing and sport-specific functional evaluations to guide rehabilitation and return-to-sport decisions.

Journal of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyVol. 27(1)
University of London (GB), University of Salerno (IT), Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR), Queen Mary University of London (GB), La Trobe University (AU), Mile End Hospital (GB), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade do Planalto Catarinense (BR), Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (BR), University Hospital in Halle (DE), Link Campus University (IT), Keele University (GB), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.