HiClim-SA: Building a High-Resolution Climate Projection Dataset for South America—Part I: CMIP6 Model Selection

High-resolution climate projection datasets for South America require careful model selection, since regional climate depends on interacting atmospheric systems across multiple scales. Consequently, evaluations based only on statistical metrics may fail to determine whether models realistically reproduce the key phenomena organizing climate over the continent. As the first step in building the HiClim-SA dataset, this study proposes a novel framework for selecting models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Evaluation metrics are derived from objective criteria defined for major atmospheric phenomena over South America and integrated through a multi-criteria ranking applied to 19 CMIP6 Earth System Models. The results revealed substantial differences in model skill across the evaluated phenomena, indicating that no single model performs best for all aspects of South American climate. Instead, only a limited subset of models emerges as consistently more robust across precipitation, convection, and atmospheric circulation, whereas the lowest-ranked models exhibit broader and more persistent biases over tropical and central South America. Comparisons with baseline rankings showed partial agreement for the best- and worst-performing models, but also important discrepancies for several intermediate models. These findings demonstrate the added value of the proposed framework by showing that process-oriented model evaluation can identify robust model results beyond what is captured by conventional climatological metrics alone. The framework therefore provides a model selection based on the analysis of multiple atmospheric phenomena and establishes the methodological foundation for the subsequent bias correction, downscaling, and future projection stages of the HiClim-SA dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli14100221
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HiClim-SA: Building a High-Resolution Climate Projection Dataset for South America—Part I: CMIP6 Model Selection

Murilo da Costa Ruv Lemes, Moacir Schmengler, Eliseu Oliveira Afonso, Marcos B. Sanches et al.
Climate
Climate variability and models
article

HiClim-SA: Building a High-Resolution Climate Projection Dataset for South America—Part I: CMIP6 Model Selection

Murilo da Costa Ruv Lemes, Moacir Schmengler, Eliseu Oliveira Afonso, Marcos B. Sanches, Gilvan Sampaio, Julliana L. M. Freire, Marília Harumi Shimizu,  Glícia Ruth Garcia de Araújo
article en

Abstract

High-resolution climate projection datasets for South America require careful model selection, since regional climate depends on interacting atmospheric systems across multiple scales. Consequently, evaluations based only on statistical metrics may fail to determine whether models realistically reproduce the key phenomena organizing climate over the continent. As the first step in building the HiClim-SA dataset, this study proposes a novel framework for selecting models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Evaluation metrics are derived from objective criteria defined for major atmospheric phenomena over South America and integrated through a multi-criteria ranking applied to 19 CMIP6 Earth System Models. The results revealed substantial differences in model skill across the evaluated phenomena, indicating that no single model performs best for all aspects of South American climate. Instead, only a limited subset of models emerges as consistently more robust across precipitation, convection, and atmospheric circulation, whereas the lowest-ranked models exhibit broader and more persistent biases over tropical and central South America. Comparisons with baseline rankings showed partial agreement for the best- and worst-performing models, but also important discrepancies for several intermediate models. These findings demonstrate the added value of the proposed framework by showing that process-oriented model evaluation can identify robust model results beyond what is captured by conventional climatological metrics alone. The framework therefore provides a model selection based on the analysis of multiple atmospheric phenomena and establishes the methodological foundation for the subsequent bias correction, downscaling, and future projection stages of the HiClim-SA dataset.

ClimateVol. 14(10)
Park Foundation (US), Itaipu Binacional (BR), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.