A Conceptual Geogrid–Soil Interaction Framework for GRS Integral Abutments under Cyclic Deck Movements

Geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) integral bridge abutments are subjected to cyclic horizontal displacements induced by seasonal thermal expansion/contraction of bridge decks, resulting in progressive settlement and lateral earth pressure development. While previous studies have primarily focused on deformation performance, the evolution of soil-reinforcement interaction mechanisms governing cyclic response remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates the cyclic behavior of four scaled physical models of GRS integral abutment with varying facing and reinforcement arrangements subjected to active (CA), passive (CP) and combined (CAP) loading over 100 cycles at different displacement amplitudes and loading rates. A rate-normalization framework was developed by combining experimental observations with validated numerical simulations and was independently verified using published datasets. Sensitivity analysis indicates that displacement amplitude is the primary factor controlling settlement accumulation and lateral pressure mobilization, whereas loading rate and number of cycles govern the rate of response evolution. Settlement under CA loading exhibited the greatest sensitivity to loading rate, while CP produced the strongest rate dependency in lateral earth pressure. Strain distributions and transition plots revealed progressive changes in reinforcement distress, supporting the proposed mechanistic framework comprising Facing Interaction (FI), Tension Anchorage (TA) and Composite Stabilization (CS) providing basis for interpreting long-term cyclic response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2026-0214
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Conceptual Geogrid–Soil Interaction Framework for GRS Integral Abutments under Cyclic Deck Movements

Ashutosh Verma
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

A Conceptual Geogrid–Soil Interaction Framework for GRS Integral Abutments under Cyclic Deck Movements

Ashutosh Verma
article en

Abstract

Geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) integral bridge abutments are subjected to cyclic horizontal displacements induced by seasonal thermal expansion/contraction of bridge decks, resulting in progressive settlement and lateral earth pressure development. While previous studies have primarily focused on deformation performance, the evolution of soil-reinforcement interaction mechanisms governing cyclic response remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates the cyclic behavior of four scaled physical models of GRS integral abutment with varying facing and reinforcement arrangements subjected to active (CA), passive (CP) and combined (CAP) loading over 100 cycles at different displacement amplitudes and loading rates. A rate-normalization framework was developed by combining experimental observations with validated numerical simulations and was independently verified using published datasets. Sensitivity analysis indicates that displacement amplitude is the primary factor controlling settlement accumulation and lateral pressure mobilization, whereas loading rate and number of cycles govern the rate of response evolution. Settlement under CA loading exhibited the greatest sensitivity to loading rate, while CP produced the strongest rate dependency in lateral earth pressure. Strain distributions and transition plots revealed progressive changes in reinforcement distress, supporting the proposed mechanistic framework comprising Facing Interaction (FI), Tension Anchorage (TA) and Composite Stabilization (CS) providing basis for interpreting long-term cyclic response.

Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.