Computation-through-Dynamics Toolkit: Simulated datasets and quality metrics for dynamical models of neural activity

A primary goal of systems neuroscience is to discover how ensembles of neurons transform inputs into goal-directed behavior, a process known as neural computation. A powerful framework for understanding neural computation uses neural dynamics - the rules that govern how neural activity evolves over time - to explain how goal-directed input-output transformations occur. As dynamical rules are not directly observable, we need computational models that can infer neural dynamics from recorded neural activity. We typically validate such models using synthetic datasets with known ground-truth dynamics, but unfortunately existing synthetic datasets don't reflect fundamental features of neural computation and may therefore be poor proxies for neural systems. Further, the field lacks validated metrics for quantifying the accuracy of the dynamics inferred by models. The Computation-through-Dynamics Toolkit (CtDToolkit) addresses these critical gaps by providing: 1) synthetic datasets that reflect computational properties of biological neural circuits, 2) interpretable metrics for quantifying model performance, and 3) a standardized pipeline for training and evaluating models with or without known external inputs. In this manuscript, we demonstrate how CtDToolkit can help guide the development, tuning, and troubleshooting of neural dynamics models. In summary, CtDToolkit provides a necessary framework for model developers to better understand and characterize neural computation through the lens of dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014755
Primary Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computation-through-Dynamics Toolkit: Simulated datasets and quality metrics for dynamical models of neural activity

Christopher Versteeg, Clayton B. Washington, Scott W. Linderman, David C. Sussillo et al.
PLoS Computational Biology
Neural dynamics and brain function
article

Computation-through-Dynamics Toolkit: Simulated datasets and quality metrics for dynamical models of neural activity

Christopher Versteeg, Clayton B. Washington, Scott W. Linderman, David C. Sussillo, Olivier Codol, Jonathan A. Michaels, Chethan Pandarinath, David M. Zoltowski, Laura N. Driscoll, Jonathan McCart, Mitchell Ostrow
article en

Abstract

A primary goal of systems neuroscience is to discover how ensembles of neurons transform inputs into goal-directed behavior, a process known as neural computation. A powerful framework for understanding neural computation uses neural dynamics - the rules that govern how neural activity evolves over time - to explain how goal-directed input-output transformations occur. As dynamical rules are not directly observable, we need computational models that can infer neural dynamics from recorded neural activity. We typically validate such models using synthetic datasets with known ground-truth dynamics, but unfortunately existing synthetic datasets don't reflect fundamental features of neural computation and may therefore be poor proxies for neural systems. Further, the field lacks validated metrics for quantifying the accuracy of the dynamics inferred by models. The Computation-through-Dynamics Toolkit (CtDToolkit) addresses these critical gaps by providing: 1) synthetic datasets that reflect computational properties of biological neural circuits, 2) interpretable metrics for quantifying model performance, and 3) a standardized pipeline for training and evaluating models with or without known external inputs. In this manuscript, we demonstrate how CtDToolkit can help guide the development, tuning, and troubleshooting of neural dynamics models. In summary, CtDToolkit provides a necessary framework for model developers to better understand and characterize neural computation through the lens of dynamics.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 22(10)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Emory University (US), York University (CA), University of Washington (US), Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA), Allen Institute for Neural Dynamics (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Université de Montréal (CA), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, Simons Foundation, Emory University, National Institutes of Health, Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Neural dynamics and brain function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.