This Group is Fire: Invisible Labor in a Successful, Coequitable Community College–University Transfer Partnership

In this critical case study, we explored invisible labor, work that is essential but essentially unrecognized, within a successful community college–university transfer partnership selected for its equitable characteristics. Our analysis of semi-structured interviews with eight partnership contributors revealed five distinct but connected invisible labor categories: orienting to transfer students, sharing individual resources, sharing institutional resources, communicating and coordinating, and cultivating a transfer-receptive culture. Study findings suggested that invisible labor in this context is categorically messy, subjective, highly relational, and instrumental in establishing and maintaining a successful coequitable transfer partnership. We concluded with implications for practice in the form of questions for readers, with remarks drawn from our data analysis. We strongly encourage readers to respond to these questions within their local contexts as they work to create and sustain coequitable transfer partnerships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community College Journal of Research and Practice
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2026.2735031
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

This Group is Fire: Invisible Labor in a Successful, Coequitable Community College–University Transfer Partnership

Mindi L. Searls, Christopher N. Varney, Wendy Smith, Leen‐Kiat Soh et al.
Community College Journal of Research and Practice
Higher Education Research Studies
article

This Group is Fire: Invisible Labor in a Successful, Coequitable Community College–University Transfer Partnership

Mindi L. Searls, Christopher N. Varney, Wendy Smith, Leen‐Kiat Soh, Michelle Maher, Camilla Ramos de Matos Carvalho Morone
article en

Abstract

In this critical case study, we explored invisible labor, work that is essential but essentially unrecognized, within a successful community college–university transfer partnership selected for its equitable characteristics. Our analysis of semi-structured interviews with eight partnership contributors revealed five distinct but connected invisible labor categories: orienting to transfer students, sharing individual resources, sharing institutional resources, communicating and coordinating, and cultivating a transfer-receptive culture. Study findings suggested that invisible labor in this context is categorically messy, subjective, highly relational, and instrumental in establishing and maintaining a successful coequitable transfer partnership. We concluded with implications for practice in the form of questions for readers, with remarks drawn from our data analysis. We strongly encourage readers to respond to these questions within their local contexts as they work to create and sustain coequitable transfer partnerships.

Community College Journal of Research and Practice
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Reduced inequalities, Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.