Retinal layer thickness as a potential marker for future cardiovascular events - a UK Biobank cohort study using optical coherence tomography

Abstract Aims Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. For CVD prevention, effective screening is needed to identify high-risk individuals. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides a noninvasive, low-cost “quick look” into the brain and has recently shown thinning of certain retinal layers in patients with previous CVD. We explored if OCT-derived retinal layer thicknesses could predict future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: stroke/myocardial infarction/cardiovascular death). Methods In this retrospective cohort study, data of 51,293 participants from the UK Biobank were analyzed. We used cause-specific hazard models to evaluate the association of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness with incident MACE, adjusting models for cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and performed subanalyses for association with incident stroke and myocardial infarction. Results Median follow-up time was 14.7 years. Both RNFL thickness (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89–0.96, p < 0.001) and GCIPL thickness (aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–1.00, p = 0.04) were statistically associated with incident MACE in cause-specific hazard models adjusted for CVRF. Interestingly, RNFL thickness was more strongly associated with incident myocardial infarction (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88–0.99, p = 0.02) while GCIPL was more strongly associated with incident stroke (aHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83–0.96, p = 0.003). Conclusion RNFL and GCIPL thicknesses are associated with future MACE, even after adjusting for CVRF. OCT-measured retinal layer thickness could contribute to the assessment of cardiovascular risk. Graphical abstract Key question : Can measurement of retinal layer thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) improve prediction of incident cardiovascular events? Key finding : Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness are associated with incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). They lead to modest improvements in prediction of MACE when both layers were added to a cause-specific hazard model based on age and sex. Take-home message : Measures of retinal layer thickness using OCT have the potential to improve cardiovascular risk screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurology
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-14175-4
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retinal layer thickness as a potential marker for future cardiovascular events - a UK Biobank cohort study using optical coherence tomography

Julian Deseoe, Veronika Kana, Neda Davoudi, Lisa Herzog et al.
Journal of Neurology
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Retinal layer thickness as a potential marker for future cardiovascular events - a UK Biobank cohort study using optical coherence tomography

Julian Deseoe, Veronika Kana, Neda Davoudi, Lisa Herzog, Martin Hänsel, Susanne Wegener, Beate Sick, Björn Menze
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. For CVD prevention, effective screening is needed to identify high-risk individuals. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides a noninvasive, low-cost “quick look” into the brain and has recently shown thinning of certain retinal layers in patients with previous CVD. We explored if OCT-derived retinal layer thicknesses could predict future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: stroke/myocardial infarction/cardiovascular death). Methods In this retrospective cohort study, data of 51,293 participants from the UK Biobank were analyzed. We used cause-specific hazard models to evaluate the association of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness with incident MACE, adjusting models for cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and performed subanalyses for association with incident stroke and myocardial infarction. Results Median follow-up time was 14.7 years. Both RNFL thickness (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89–0.96, p < 0.001) and GCIPL thickness (aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92–1.00, p = 0.04) were statistically associated with incident MACE in cause-specific hazard models adjusted for CVRF. Interestingly, RNFL thickness was more strongly associated with incident myocardial infarction (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88–0.99, p = 0.02) while GCIPL was more strongly associated with incident stroke (aHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83–0.96, p = 0.003). Conclusion RNFL and GCIPL thicknesses are associated with future MACE, even after adjusting for CVRF. OCT-measured retinal layer thickness could contribute to the assessment of cardiovascular risk. Graphical abstract Key question : Can measurement of retinal layer thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) improve prediction of incident cardiovascular events? Key finding : Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness are associated with incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). They lead to modest improvements in prediction of MACE when both layers were added to a cause-specific hazard model based on age and sex. Take-home message : Measures of retinal layer thickness using OCT have the potential to improve cardiovascular risk screening.

Journal of NeurologyVol. 273(11)
University of Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Universität Zürich, Baugarten Stiftung
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.