Predictors of Visual Outcomes in Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor Resection

ABSTRACT Objective: We sought to identify clinical and radiologic predictors of visual recovery and explore visual outcomes in patients who underwent transsphenoidal resection of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Methods: Retrospective study of patients with PitNETs approaching/contacting the chiasm at a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice. Clinical/demographic/MRI data were analyzed. Patients with a final visual acuity (VA) of at least 20/40 and a final visual field mean deviation (VF MD) of −5 dB or better were defined as positive outcomes. Results: 68 patients were analyzed, including 44 patients who underwent surgery and 24 who were observed during the study period. Of those who underwent surgery, patients with positive VA outcomes had better preoperative VA (logMAR 0.3 vs 1.3), VF MD (−8.1 vs −17.9 dB), thicker retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) (81.9 vs 69.5 µm) and ganglion cell complexes (GCC) (69.0 vs 50.5 µm) than those without. VF outcomes were predicted by better preoperative VA (logMAR 0.3 vs 0.7), VF MD (−7.4 vs −14.5 dB), thicker RNFL (84.1 vs 70.5 µm) and GCC (71.2 vs 55.6 µm) measurements and smaller tumor volume (8.4 vs 18.2 cm 3 ). Conclusion: Preoperative VA/VF MD/RNFL/GCC thickness may predict visual outcomes after PitNET resection. Neuroradiologic factors failed to predict visual outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2026.10689
Primary Topic
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of Visual Outcomes in Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor Resection

Ruth Lau, Alexandre Boutet, Mikail Malik, Edward Margolin et al.
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
article

Predictors of Visual Outcomes in Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor Resection

Ruth Lau, Alexandre Boutet, Mikail Malik, Edward Margolin, Lauren Pickel, Chi-Wei Tien, Aristotelis Kalyvas, Yash Patel
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: We sought to identify clinical and radiologic predictors of visual recovery and explore visual outcomes in patients who underwent transsphenoidal resection of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Methods: Retrospective study of patients with PitNETs approaching/contacting the chiasm at a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice. Clinical/demographic/MRI data were analyzed. Patients with a final visual acuity (VA) of at least 20/40 and a final visual field mean deviation (VF MD) of −5 dB or better were defined as positive outcomes. Results: 68 patients were analyzed, including 44 patients who underwent surgery and 24 who were observed during the study period. Of those who underwent surgery, patients with positive VA outcomes had better preoperative VA (logMAR 0.3 vs 1.3), VF MD (−8.1 vs −17.9 dB), thicker retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) (81.9 vs 69.5 µm) and ganglion cell complexes (GCC) (69.0 vs 50.5 µm) than those without. VF outcomes were predicted by better preoperative VA (logMAR 0.3 vs 0.7), VF MD (−7.4 vs −14.5 dB), thicker RNFL (84.1 vs 70.5 µm) and GCC (71.2 vs 55.6 µm) measurements and smaller tumor volume (8.4 vs 18.2 cm 3 ). Conclusion: Preoperative VA/VF MD/RNFL/GCC thickness may predict visual outcomes after PitNET resection. Neuroradiologic factors failed to predict visual outcomes.

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
University of Toronto (CA), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.