Multimodal Cataract Severity Classification from AS-OCT Examination Reports: Analyzing the Complementarity of B-Scan Images and A-Scan Profiles

Background/Objectives: Deep learning on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) has been applied mainly to nuclear cataract. This study evaluated whether the A-scan profile in Anterion reports adds information to the B-scan image for classifying nuclear (N), cortical (C), and posterior subcapsular (P) cataract severity. Methods: B-scan images and A-scan profiles were extracted from 1416 reports of 691 patients. LOCS III grades were converted into three levels (None/Mild, Moderate, Advanced); inter-observer agreement was excellent (weighted κ 0.84–0.97). Image and profile encoders were combined using five fusion strategies and evaluated with patient-level 5-fold cross-validation. Results: Adding the A-scan profile improved F1 for N (+0.030) and P (+0.094) but not for C (−0.002). All fusion strategies outperformed single-modality models and performed comparably (average F1 0.514–0.531). For P, the gain was largest at the Moderate grade (F1 0.183 to 0.336), and masking the profile segment containing the posterior capsule caused the largest drop. B-scan line profiles could not replace the device-provided profile, and most misclassifications occurred between adjacent grades. Conclusions: The A-scan profile provided a useful incremental contribution, particularly for N and P, in this single-center dataset. The approach may be useful in retrospective and multi-center settings, but this remains to be demonstrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16203362
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal Cataract Severity Classification from AS-OCT Examination Reports: Analyzing the Complementarity of B-Scan Images and A-Scan Profiles

이종주, Ho Gil Jung, Gangmin Park, Min-Seok Kim
Diagnostics
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Multimodal Cataract Severity Classification from AS-OCT Examination Reports: Analyzing the Complementarity of B-Scan Images and A-Scan Profiles

이종주, Ho Gil Jung, Gangmin Park, Min-Seok Kim
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Deep learning on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) has been applied mainly to nuclear cataract. This study evaluated whether the A-scan profile in Anterion reports adds information to the B-scan image for classifying nuclear (N), cortical (C), and posterior subcapsular (P) cataract severity. Methods: B-scan images and A-scan profiles were extracted from 1416 reports of 691 patients. LOCS III grades were converted into three levels (None/Mild, Moderate, Advanced); inter-observer agreement was excellent (weighted κ 0.84–0.97). Image and profile encoders were combined using five fusion strategies and evaluated with patient-level 5-fold cross-validation. Results: Adding the A-scan profile improved F1 for N (+0.030) and P (+0.094) but not for C (−0.002). All fusion strategies outperformed single-modality models and performed comparably (average F1 0.514–0.531). For P, the gain was largest at the Moderate grade (F1 0.183 to 0.336), and masking the profile segment containing the posterior capsule caused the largest drop. B-scan line profiles could not replace the device-provided profile, and most misclassifications occurred between adjacent grades. Conclusions: The A-scan profile provided a useful incremental contribution, particularly for N and P, in this single-center dataset. The approach may be useful in retrospective and multi-center settings, but this remains to be demonstrated.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(20)
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR), National Medical Center (KR)
National Medical Center
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.