Time course of muscle hypertrophy with and without progressive overload

To compare the time course of muscle hypertrophy during resistance training with progressive overload (PROG) or without overload progression (N-PROG), 31 healthy untrained young adults completed a randomized within-subject trial. Each participant trained one leg with PROG and the contralateral leg with N-PROG using unilateral knee extension (3x10-12 repetitions, twice weekly for 12 weeks). Load was progressively adjusted in PROG and kept constant in N-PROG. Muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) was assessed at Pre and after sessions 6, 12, 18, and 24. A protocol×time interaction was observed for mCSA (p=0.002). Both protocols increased mCSA from Pre to S24 (PROG: 3.36±1.94 cm²; N-PROG: 2.67±1.86 cm²), with no significant between-protocol differences in mCSA at the individual assessment time points. However, the increase in mCSA from S18 to S24 was greater in PROG than in N-PROG (between-protocol difference in change: 1.22 cm², 95% CI 0.59 to 1.84; p<0.001). Repetitions in reserve (RIR) was 0.47±0.61 at S1 and 0.20±0.37 at S24 in PROG, and 1.50±1.11 and 4.08±1.94, respectively, in N-PROG. Overall volume load and perceived exertion were greater in PROG (p<0.001). The PROG protocol maintained high relative effort, and the greater increase in mCSA compared with N-PROG was observed specifically from S18 to S24.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2980-6473
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time course of muscle hypertrophy with and without progressive overload

Cleiton Augusto Libardi, Marcelo Nascimento Rebelatto, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Diego Bittencourt et al.
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Sports Performance and Training
article

Time course of muscle hypertrophy with and without progressive overload

Cleiton Augusto Libardi, Marcelo Nascimento Rebelatto, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Diego Bittencourt, Deivid Gomes da Silva, Enya T. A. Nacafucasaco, Otavio Ferrari, Matheus Iasulaitis, Ana C. C. Melo, Bruno K. R. Pereira, Júlio B. B. Camargo
article en

Abstract

To compare the time course of muscle hypertrophy during resistance training with progressive overload (PROG) or without overload progression (N-PROG), 31 healthy untrained young adults completed a randomized within-subject trial. Each participant trained one leg with PROG and the contralateral leg with N-PROG using unilateral knee extension (3x10-12 repetitions, twice weekly for 12 weeks). Load was progressively adjusted in PROG and kept constant in N-PROG. Muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) was assessed at Pre and after sessions 6, 12, 18, and 24. A protocol×time interaction was observed for mCSA (p=0.002). Both protocols increased mCSA from Pre to S24 (PROG: 3.36±1.94 cm²; N-PROG: 2.67±1.86 cm²), with no significant between-protocol differences in mCSA at the individual assessment time points. However, the increase in mCSA from S18 to S24 was greater in PROG than in N-PROG (between-protocol difference in change: 1.22 cm², 95% CI 0.59 to 1.84; p<0.001). Repetitions in reserve (RIR) was 0.47±0.61 at S1 and 0.20±0.37 at S24 in PROG, and 1.50±1.11 and 4.08±1.94, respectively, in N-PROG. Overall volume load and perceived exertion were greater in PROG (p<0.001). The PROG protocol maintained high relative effort, and the greater increase in mCSA compared with N-PROG was observed specifically from S18 to S24.

International Journal of Sports Medicine
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.