AI-Enabled Wearable Sensor Technologies for Athlete Performance Monitoring: A Critical Review of Signal Processing, Machine Learning, and Real-Time Embedded Systems

Abstract Wearable sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly being used to quantify athlete movement, physiological response, training load, and recovery in field and laboratory settings. However, the practical value of these systems depends not only on the predictive capability of an algorithm but also on sensor validity, signal quality, hardware constraints, real-time processing, and the transferability of models across athletes and sports. This review examines the technical pipeline linking wearable electronic sensors to athlete-monitoring decisions, with particular attention to inertial measurement units, global navigation satellite systems, photoplethysmography, electrocardiography, electromyography, pressure sensing, and multimodal systems. It synthesizes evidence on signal conditioning, segmentation, feature engineering, classical machine learning, deep learning, sensor fusion, edge inference, and embedded implementation. Existing reviews indicate that wearable devices can support useful monitoring, but accuracy varies by metric, device, movement pattern, and validation setting; performance under controlled conditions should not be assumed to generalize to competition. Key challenges include motion artifacts, inconsistent protocols, small and imbalanced datasets, leakage between training and test sets, limited external validation, battery and communication constraints, privacy, and unclear decision thresholds. The review proposes a layered reference architecture and a validation framework that links engineering performance to sport-specific usefulness. Future research should prioritize synchronized multimodal datasets, athlete-independent testing, interpretable and uncertainty-aware models, energy-efficient edge AI, secure data governance, and transparent reporting. The article’s contribution is an engineering-oriented synthesis that connects sensor physics and embedded constraints with the needs of physical education and sports science. Keywords: Inertial Measurement Units; Physiological Sensing; Sensor Fusion; Edge Computing; Sports Biomechanics Keywords: edge computing; Keywords: Inertial Measurement Units; Physiological Sensing; Sensor Fusion; Sports Biomechanics

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64823/ijstm.2601002
Primary Topic
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Enabled Wearable Sensor Technologies for Athlete Performance Monitoring: A Critical Review of Signal Processing, Machine Learning, and Real-Time Embedded Systems

nbspDr. Vikas Kundu
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
article

AI-Enabled Wearable Sensor Technologies for Athlete Performance Monitoring: A Critical Review of Signal Processing, Machine Learning, and Real-Time Embedded Systems

nbspDr. Vikas Kundu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wearable sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly being used to quantify athlete movement, physiological response, training load, and recovery in field and laboratory settings. However, the practical value of these systems depends not only on the predictive capability of an algorithm but also on sensor validity, signal quality, hardware constraints, real-time processing, and the transferability of models across athletes and sports. This review examines the technical pipeline linking wearable electronic sensors to athlete-monitoring decisions, with particular attention to inertial measurement units, global navigation satellite systems, photoplethysmography, electrocardiography, electromyography, pressure sensing, and multimodal systems. It synthesizes evidence on signal conditioning, segmentation, feature engineering, classical machine learning, deep learning, sensor fusion, edge inference, and embedded implementation. Existing reviews indicate that wearable devices can support useful monitoring, but accuracy varies by metric, device, movement pattern, and validation setting; performance under controlled conditions should not be assumed to generalize to competition. Key challenges include motion artifacts, inconsistent protocols, small and imbalanced datasets, leakage between training and test sets, limited external validation, battery and communication constraints, privacy, and unclear decision thresholds. The review proposes a layered reference architecture and a validation framework that links engineering performance to sport-specific usefulness. Future research should prioritize synchronized multimodal datasets, athlete-independent testing, interpretable and uncertainty-aware models, energy-efficient edge AI, secure data governance, and transparent reporting. The article’s contribution is an engineering-oriented synthesis that connects sensor physics and embedded constraints with the needs of physical education and sports science. Keywords: Inertial Measurement Units; Physiological Sensing; Sensor Fusion; Edge Computing; Sports Biomechanics Keywords: edge computing; Keywords: Inertial Measurement Units; Physiological Sensing; Sensor Fusion; Sports Biomechanics

Vol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.