Matched analysis of the LACE+ score for post-operative outcomes in patients with intradural spinal tumors

Objective The management of intradural spinal tumors can be complex and associated with high resource utilization. The LACE+ index is a validated tool developed to predict post-operative readmission and mortality. This study evaluated the utility of LACE+ in patients undergoing surgery for intradural spinal tumors.Methods Data on patients undergoing spinal oncology surgery for intradural tumors (n = 275) with LACE+ score was collected. Coarsened exact matching was used to control for confounding variables and assess the predictive value of LACE+. Patients with a LACE+ score in the top quartile (≥ 58, n = 18) were compared to matched patients in the bottom quartile (≤23, n = 18). A secondary analysis compared the top (> 44, n = 58) and bottom (≤ 44, n = 58) halves. Outcomes included 30- and 90-day ED visits, readmissions, reoperations, non-home discharges, and mortality.Results After matching, patients in the top LACE+ quartile had greater odds of non-home discharge (OR 5.80, p = 0.02) and 90-day readmission (OR 5.52, p = 0.04). In the secondary analysis, patients in the top half had greater odds of non-home discharge (OR 2.5, p = 0.04).Conclusions Higher LACE+ scores were associated with non-home discharge and 90-day readmission after intradural spinal tumor surgery. Application of this tool may guide risk stratification and perioperative management of patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2026.2743510
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Matched analysis of the LACE+ score for post-operative outcomes in patients with intradural spinal tumors

Neil R. Malhotra, Colbey W. Freeman, Emily Xu, Joshua L. Golubovsky et al.
British Journal of Neurosurgery
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Matched analysis of the LACE+ score for post-operative outcomes in patients with intradural spinal tumors

Neil R. Malhotra, Colbey W. Freeman, Emily Xu, Joshua L. Golubovsky, Scott D. McClintock, Gabrielle W. Peters, Anish A. Butala, Mackenzie Castellanos, Alvand Hassankhani, Hayley Michelle Knollman, James Schuster, Jennifer Cirvello, Sumasri Kotha, Kristen H. Park
article en

Abstract

Objective The management of intradural spinal tumors can be complex and associated with high resource utilization. The LACE+ index is a validated tool developed to predict post-operative readmission and mortality. This study evaluated the utility of LACE+ in patients undergoing surgery for intradural spinal tumors.Methods Data on patients undergoing spinal oncology surgery for intradural tumors (n = 275) with LACE+ score was collected. Coarsened exact matching was used to control for confounding variables and assess the predictive value of LACE+. Patients with a LACE+ score in the top quartile (≥ 58, n = 18) were compared to matched patients in the bottom quartile (≤23, n = 18). A secondary analysis compared the top (> 44, n = 58) and bottom (≤ 44, n = 58) halves. Outcomes included 30- and 90-day ED visits, readmissions, reoperations, non-home discharges, and mortality.Results After matching, patients in the top LACE+ quartile had greater odds of non-home discharge (OR 5.80, p = 0.02) and 90-day readmission (OR 5.52, p = 0.04). In the secondary analysis, patients in the top half had greater odds of non-home discharge (OR 2.5, p = 0.04).Conclusions Higher LACE+ scores were associated with non-home discharge and 90-day readmission after intradural spinal tumor surgery. Application of this tool may guide risk stratification and perioperative management of patients.

British Journal of Neurosurgery
West Chester University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.