Research Capacity and Culture of Podiatrists in Canada (Quebec) and France: A Parallel Cross‐Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Research capacity and culture (RCC) are essential for high-quality care. However, RCC remains poorly documented among French-speaking podiatrists. This study aimed to assess RCC among podiatrists in Quebec, Canada, and France at the individual, team, and organizational levels, and to compare RCC scores between both groups. METHOD: A parallel, cross-sectional study was conducted targeting all licensed podiatrists practicing in Quebec, Canada (n = 304) and France (n = 14,208) in 2023. The data collection was carried online using a validated French version of the RCC tool items at the individual, team, and organizational levels using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no ability) to 10 (perfect ability). Mean RCC item scores (±SEM) were compared between Quebec and France respondents, with exploratory item-level analyses. Regression analyses were also used to determine associations between sociodemographic characteristics and overall RCC scores. RESULTS: A total of 2272 podiatrists initiated the survey (127 from Quebec and 2145 from France). Overall, mean individual RCC scores were low, but significantly higher in respondents from Quebec than those from France (3.32 vs. 2.75; p < 0.05). Team scores (2.29 vs. 1.82; p < 0.05) and organizational scores were also low overall, but significantly higher in respondents from Quebec than those from France (2.31 vs. 1.84; p < 0.05). Higher overall RCC scores were significantly associated with more dedicated research time, active research involvement, and research training; among Quebec podiatrists, practice outside private practice was also associated with higher RCC scores (all, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first analysis of RCC among French-speaking podiatrists, and overall RCC levels were low. Higher RCC scores were associated with active research involvement, dedicated research time, research training, and, among Quebec podiatrists, practice outside private practice. These findings highlight potential targets for capacity-building initiatives to strengthen evidence-based podiatry in French-speaking contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70227
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Capacity and Culture of Podiatrists in Canada (Quebec) and France: A Parallel Cross‐Sectional Study

Magali Brousseau‐Foley, Antoine Perrier, Sergio Cortez Ghio, Virginie Blanchette et al.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Research Capacity and Culture of Podiatrists in Canada (Quebec) and France: A Parallel Cross‐Sectional Study

Magali Brousseau‐Foley, Antoine Perrier, Sergio Cortez Ghio, Virginie Blanchette, Peter Anthony Lazzarini, Solène Libier
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Research capacity and culture (RCC) are essential for high-quality care. However, RCC remains poorly documented among French-speaking podiatrists. This study aimed to assess RCC among podiatrists in Quebec, Canada, and France at the individual, team, and organizational levels, and to compare RCC scores between both groups. METHOD: A parallel, cross-sectional study was conducted targeting all licensed podiatrists practicing in Quebec, Canada (n = 304) and France (n = 14,208) in 2023. The data collection was carried online using a validated French version of the RCC tool items at the individual, team, and organizational levels using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no ability) to 10 (perfect ability). Mean RCC item scores (±SEM) were compared between Quebec and France respondents, with exploratory item-level analyses. Regression analyses were also used to determine associations between sociodemographic characteristics and overall RCC scores. RESULTS: A total of 2272 podiatrists initiated the survey (127 from Quebec and 2145 from France). Overall, mean individual RCC scores were low, but significantly higher in respondents from Quebec than those from France (3.32 vs. 2.75; p < 0.05). Team scores (2.29 vs. 1.82; p < 0.05) and organizational scores were also low overall, but significantly higher in respondents from Quebec than those from France (2.31 vs. 1.84; p < 0.05). Higher overall RCC scores were significantly associated with more dedicated research time, active research involvement, and research training; among Quebec podiatrists, practice outside private practice was also associated with higher RCC scores (all, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first analysis of RCC among French-speaking podiatrists, and overall RCC levels were low. Higher RCC scores were associated with active research involvement, dedicated research time, research training, and, among Quebec podiatrists, practice outside private practice. These findings highlight potential targets for capacity-building initiatives to strengthen evidence-based podiatry in French-speaking contexts.

Journal of Foot and Ankle ResearchVol. 19(4)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec (CA), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Prince Charles Hospital (AU), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.