Comparative Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Phytic Acid and Twin Kleen on Root Canal Dentin: An in Vitro Study

Aim: To comparatively evaluate the smear layer removal efficacy of phytic acid and Twin Kleen on root canal dentin using stereomicroscopic evaluation of longitudinally sectioned root specimens. Materials and Methods: This in vitro comparative study included 40 specimens randomly allocated into two experimental groups (n=20 each): Group I, phytic acid; and Group II, Twin Kleen. Following biomechanical preparation, the assigned chelating irrigant was used for smear-layer removal. The roots were subsequently sectioned longitudinally and evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0. Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests, and intergroup comparison was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The mean smear-layer score was 2.75±0.50 in the phytic acid group and 1.50±0.40 in the Twin Kleen group. Lower scores represented less residual smear layer. The reported intergroup difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro model, Twin Kleen produced a lower mean smear-layer score than phytic acid. The findings should be interpreted in the context of the specific specimen preparation, irrigant exposure and stereomicroscopic assessment used in the present study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of chemical health risks
Published
2026-10-13
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Phytic Acid and Twin Kleen on Root Canal Dentin: An in Vitro Study

Siddhesh Bandekar
Journal of chemical health risks
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Comparative Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Phytic Acid and Twin Kleen on Root Canal Dentin: An in Vitro Study

Siddhesh Bandekar
article en

Abstract

Aim: To comparatively evaluate the smear layer removal efficacy of phytic acid and Twin Kleen on root canal dentin using stereomicroscopic evaluation of longitudinally sectioned root specimens. Materials and Methods: This in vitro comparative study included 40 specimens randomly allocated into two experimental groups (n=20 each): Group I, phytic acid; and Group II, Twin Kleen. Following biomechanical preparation, the assigned chelating irrigant was used for smear-layer removal. The roots were subsequently sectioned longitudinally and evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0. Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests, and intergroup comparison was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The mean smear-layer score was 2.75±0.50 in the phytic acid group and 1.50±0.40 in the Twin Kleen group. Lower scores represented less residual smear layer. The reported intergroup difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro model, Twin Kleen produced a lower mean smear-layer score than phytic acid. The findings should be interpreted in the context of the specific specimen preparation, irrigant exposure and stereomicroscopic assessment used in the present study.

Journal of chemical health risks
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.