Partial versus full high-performance cementitious grout replacement for seismic strengthening of RC shear walls

To clarify the seismic response of RC shear walls retrofitted via high-performance cementitious grout (HPCG) replacement, five specimens were tested under quasi-static loading, focusing on the effects of replacement extent (partial versus full) and replacement location (boundary element, single side, double side) on the failure mode, load-displacement response, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation capacity. The results showed that the fully replaced specimen achieved a 10.5% increase in peak horizontal load, accompanied by significant gains in stiffness, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity, with an acceptable 4.5% reduction in ultimate displacement. The three partially replaced specimens exhibited increased load-carrying capacity and stiffness, reduced ultimate displacement, and comparable ductility; among them, the boundary element replacement specimen offered the best balance between strength enhancement and deformation capacity. A preliminary comparative measure was proposed to enable quantitative comparison among the investigated schemes, yielding the following ranking in descending order: full replacement, boundary element replacement, double-side replacement, and single-side replacement. A refined finite element model, validated against the test results, was further employed for parametric analysis. The analysis revealed that the peak horizontal load increased with the compressive strength of both concrete and HPCG; for concrete, the increase rate gradually slowed, whereas for HPCG, it remained approximately linear. The peak horizontal load also increased with the replacement rate, though with a progressively diminishing return. Within the investigated range, a replacement height of 1.0 times the shear wall length provided favorable load-carrying capacity. Additionally, a calculation method for the load‑carrying capacity of RC shear walls strengthened with HPCG was established and subsequently validated against the test results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structures
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2026.113308
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partial versus full high-performance cementitious grout replacement for seismic strengthening of RC shear walls

Keyan Deng, Xiaopeng Hu, Tiansong ZHAO, Hang Zhang
Structures
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Partial versus full high-performance cementitious grout replacement for seismic strengthening of RC shear walls

Keyan Deng, Xiaopeng Hu, Tiansong ZHAO, Hang Zhang
article en

Abstract

To clarify the seismic response of RC shear walls retrofitted via high-performance cementitious grout (HPCG) replacement, five specimens were tested under quasi-static loading, focusing on the effects of replacement extent (partial versus full) and replacement location (boundary element, single side, double side) on the failure mode, load-displacement response, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation capacity. The results showed that the fully replaced specimen achieved a 10.5% increase in peak horizontal load, accompanied by significant gains in stiffness, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity, with an acceptable 4.5% reduction in ultimate displacement. The three partially replaced specimens exhibited increased load-carrying capacity and stiffness, reduced ultimate displacement, and comparable ductility; among them, the boundary element replacement specimen offered the best balance between strength enhancement and deformation capacity. A preliminary comparative measure was proposed to enable quantitative comparison among the investigated schemes, yielding the following ranking in descending order: full replacement, boundary element replacement, double-side replacement, and single-side replacement. A refined finite element model, validated against the test results, was further employed for parametric analysis. The analysis revealed that the peak horizontal load increased with the compressive strength of both concrete and HPCG; for concrete, the increase rate gradually slowed, whereas for HPCG, it remained approximately linear. The peak horizontal load also increased with the replacement rate, though with a progressively diminishing return. Within the investigated range, a replacement height of 1.0 times the shear wall length provided favorable load-carrying capacity. Additionally, a calculation method for the load‑carrying capacity of RC shear walls strengthened with HPCG was established and subsequently validated against the test results.

StructuresVol. 94
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.