Operational efficiency intelligence in urban food distribution: a DEA-based analytical framework

Purpose Inefficiencies of food suppliers are of great concern in the emerging economies, as they ensure food security and generate mass employment. This study aims to develop a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based framework to evaluate the operational efficiency of last-mile food distribution systems across heterogeneous urban income zones. While prior research has examined routing optimization and cost reduction, limited studies explain structural efficiency differences across comparable distribution units. This study conceptualizes operational efficiency as an outcome of logistics capability configuration. Design/methodology/approach An input-oriented charnes, cooper, and rhodes (CCR) DEA model was applied to 20 distributors (DMUs). Technical Efficiency (TE), Allocative Efficiency (AE) and Economic Efficiency (EE) were estimated using operational inputs including routing distance, labor/work hours, operational expenditure and delivery workload, along with outputs such as delivery performance, pricing feasibility and customer satisfaction. DEA slack analysis and frontier analysis served as benchmark identification as operational inefficiencies and improvement potential. Findings The findings of this study revealed substantial efficiency variation among distributors. Efficient distributors maintained stable routing intervals, balanced workforce allocation, adaptive pricing strategies and controlled operational expenditure. Distributors operating in High-Income Group (HIG) and Upper Middle-Income Group (UMIG) zones demonstrated stronger allocative efficiency because of higher pricing flexibility, whereas Low-Income Group (LIG) and Lower Middle-Income Group (LMIG) distributors relied more heavily on operational adaptability and delivery intensity. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to 20 distributors and within a specific geography. Future studies may incorporate larger data sets, multiple regions, sustainability indicators and advanced DEA or AI-integrated optimization models for broader operational insights. Practical implications The framework offers useful guidance for making better decisions about route planning, adjusting prices, balancing workloads and ensuring long-term success in city food distribution systems. Originality/value This study extends DEA beyond conventional efficiency estimation by integrating routing adaptability, pricing responsiveness, customer satisfaction and heterogeneous income-zone dynamics within last-mile food distribution networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modelling in Management
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-03-2026-0155
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operational efficiency intelligence in urban food distribution: a DEA-based analytical framework

Satyajit Mahato, Pratyush Sinha
Journal of Modelling in Management
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Operational efficiency intelligence in urban food distribution: a DEA-based analytical framework

Satyajit Mahato, Pratyush Sinha
article en

Abstract

Purpose Inefficiencies of food suppliers are of great concern in the emerging economies, as they ensure food security and generate mass employment. This study aims to develop a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based framework to evaluate the operational efficiency of last-mile food distribution systems across heterogeneous urban income zones. While prior research has examined routing optimization and cost reduction, limited studies explain structural efficiency differences across comparable distribution units. This study conceptualizes operational efficiency as an outcome of logistics capability configuration. Design/methodology/approach An input-oriented charnes, cooper, and rhodes (CCR) DEA model was applied to 20 distributors (DMUs). Technical Efficiency (TE), Allocative Efficiency (AE) and Economic Efficiency (EE) were estimated using operational inputs including routing distance, labor/work hours, operational expenditure and delivery workload, along with outputs such as delivery performance, pricing feasibility and customer satisfaction. DEA slack analysis and frontier analysis served as benchmark identification as operational inefficiencies and improvement potential. Findings The findings of this study revealed substantial efficiency variation among distributors. Efficient distributors maintained stable routing intervals, balanced workforce allocation, adaptive pricing strategies and controlled operational expenditure. Distributors operating in High-Income Group (HIG) and Upper Middle-Income Group (UMIG) zones demonstrated stronger allocative efficiency because of higher pricing flexibility, whereas Low-Income Group (LIG) and Lower Middle-Income Group (LMIG) distributors relied more heavily on operational adaptability and delivery intensity. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to 20 distributors and within a specific geography. Future studies may incorporate larger data sets, multiple regions, sustainability indicators and advanced DEA or AI-integrated optimization models for broader operational insights. Practical implications The framework offers useful guidance for making better decisions about route planning, adjusting prices, balancing workloads and ensuring long-term success in city food distribution systems. Originality/value This study extends DEA beyond conventional efficiency estimation by integrating routing adaptability, pricing responsiveness, customer satisfaction and heterogeneous income-zone dynamics within last-mile food distribution networks.

Journal of Modelling in Management
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Reduced inequalities, Zero hunger, No poverty, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.