Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Non–Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes
BackgroundContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to be beneficial in persons with type 1 diabetes and others with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, but its role in the treatment of persons with type 2 diabetes not being treated with insulin has needed further study. MethodsIn a 26-week trial conducted at 22 primary care practices in the United States, we randomly assigned adults with type 2 diabetes who were not using insulin to either CGM or routine care (control). The primary outcome was the glycated hemoglobin level at 26 weeks. Key CGM-measured secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically to control the type I error rate. ResultsA total of 145 participants were assigned to the CGM group, and 138 to the routine-care group. Participants ranged in age from 21 to 84 years. The mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin level decreased from 8.8±1.3% at baseline to 7.2±1.1% at 26 weeks in the CGM group and from 8.7±1.2% to 8.0±1.4% in the routine-care group (adjusted mean difference, −0.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.1 to −0.6; P<0.001). The mean percentage of time that the CGM-measured glucose level was in the glucose-level range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter was 21 percentage points higher (95% CI, 16 to 26) with CGM than with routine care (P<0.001). The between-group difference in the percentage of time that the glucose level was below 54 mg per deciliter was −0.17 percentage points (95% CI, −0.27 to −0.11; P<0.001 for noninferiority); the difference in the percentage of time that the glucose level was below 70 mg per deciliter was −0.20 percentage points (95% CI, −0.43 to −0.09; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.004 for superiority). No severe hypoglycemia events were reported. ConclusionsAmong adults with type 2 diabetes that was not being treated with insulin and was being managed in a primary care setting, the use of CGM led to a greater reduction in the glycated hemoglobin level and to a lower risk of hyperglycemia than routine care. (Funded by Dexcom; CONNECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06601166.)
Authors
- David Pickering
- Erik Seth Kramer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5428-1724)
- Ku-Lang Chang
- Matthew L. Johnson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9576-9450)
- Jessica R. Castle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1179-5374)
- Benjamin Cook (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6824-4632)
- Karen E Elkind-Hirsch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-4009)
- Sean M. Oser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-3087)
- Tamara K. Oser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0405-3420)
- Thomas W. Martens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9858-2138)
- Simon Bergford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0213-7059)
- Katrina J. Ruedy
- Stayce E. Beck
- Rita Schmid
- Peter M. Calhoun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5325-7200)
- Roy W. Beck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-8446)
- Ryan J. Bailey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5763-4598)
- Amir Herman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6053-7414)
- NELLY N. CADET
- Martin Ortega
- Beth A. Klug
- Nitinchandra D. Desai
- Bryce Peterson
- Edwin Burkett
- Jamie L. Haynes
- Lisa Davidson
- R. Lacy Anderson
- Shehzad M. Topiwala
Institutions
- Fayetteville VA Medical Center (US)
- Newport Restoration Foundation (US)
- Northport VA Medical Center (US)
- Indiana University South Bend (US)
- Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
- Dexcom (United States) (US)
- Riverside Regional Medical Center (US)
- Mountain Diabetes and Endocrine Center (US)
- Morehead State University (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
- HealthPartners (US)
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2608571
- Primary Topic
- Diabetes Management and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Dexcom