Deviant Behaviours in Flood Risk Management: A Novel Typology

ABSTRACT Flooding has become an increasing threat across the globe and risk is likely to rise in the coming decades. In this context, individuals and communities are expected to assume certain tasks and responsibilities, including following the rules and guidance of flood risk management (FRM) agencies. However, such collaboration does not always align seamlessly and may instead involve what we term deviant behaviour. Individuals or groups may act in ways that deviate from the expectations or aspirations of the state or the majority of society, with negative consequences. This paper suggests a typology of such deviant behaviours, with examples occurring before, during or after a flood event. The typology encompasses different forms of behaviours, ranging from the inappropriate and uncooperative to anti‐social behaviour and illegal actions. We suggest that FRM agencies—often surprised by and unprepared for such behaviours—need to integrate a recognition of deviant behaviours into their operational logic rather than continue to ignore them. Furthermore, deviant behaviour is not fully addressed directly in the current academic FRM debates. Consequently, there remain significant gaps in understanding, such as the many reasons behind these phenomena, and further research should focus on the significance of deviant behaviours in FRM in relation to their drivers and the consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70258
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deviant Behaviours in Flood Risk Management: A Novel Typology

Thomas Thaler, Edmund C. Penning‐Rowsell
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Deviant Behaviours in Flood Risk Management: A Novel Typology

Thomas Thaler, Edmund C. Penning‐Rowsell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Flooding has become an increasing threat across the globe and risk is likely to rise in the coming decades. In this context, individuals and communities are expected to assume certain tasks and responsibilities, including following the rules and guidance of flood risk management (FRM) agencies. However, such collaboration does not always align seamlessly and may instead involve what we term deviant behaviour. Individuals or groups may act in ways that deviate from the expectations or aspirations of the state or the majority of society, with negative consequences. This paper suggests a typology of such deviant behaviours, with examples occurring before, during or after a flood event. The typology encompasses different forms of behaviours, ranging from the inappropriate and uncooperative to anti‐social behaviour and illegal actions. We suggest that FRM agencies—often surprised by and unprepared for such behaviours—need to integrate a recognition of deviant behaviours into their operational logic rather than continue to ignore them. Furthermore, deviant behaviour is not fully addressed directly in the current academic FRM debates. Consequently, there remain significant gaps in understanding, such as the many reasons behind these phenomena, and further research should focus on the significance of deviant behaviours in FRM in relation to their drivers and the consequences.

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 19(4)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Middlesex University London (GB), BOKU University (AT)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.