Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire in Individuals with Transtibial Amputation

Introduction: Satisfaction with prosthetic devices is a key determinant of functional outcomes and quality of life in individuals with lower-limb amputation. Donning and doffing a prosthesis are essential daily activities that may influence user satisfaction and clinical decision-making. However, no validated Persian instrument is currently available to specifically assess these aspects. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire (PDDQ) in individuals with transtibial amputation. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional repeated-measures study included 104 individuals with transtibial amputation. The translation and cultural adaptation followed established guidelines, including forward and backward translation, expert committee review, and pilot testing. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency and test–retest reliability (n = 33; 7–14-day interval). Concurrent validity was evaluated by examining correlations between the Persian version of the PDDQ (P-PDDQ) and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales. Known-groups validity was assessed based on different suspension systems. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha of the P-PDDQ obtained 0.62, showing close to acceptable range for internal consistency. Excellent test–retest reliability was demonstrated, with intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.91 to 0.99. Concurrent validity analysis showed no significant correlations between the total P-PDDQ score and Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales subscales, except for the functional satisfaction subscale ( P = 0.02). Known-groups validity revealed significant differences between participants using anatomical and pin/lock suspension systems in domains related to donning and doffing satisfaction. Conclusions: The P-PDDQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing satisfaction with prosthesis donning and doffing in individuals with transtibial amputation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jpo.0000000000000660
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire in Individuals with Transtibial Amputation

Mojtaba Kamyab, Hamid Pezham, Vahideh Moradi, Taher Babaee et al.
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire in Individuals with Transtibial Amputation

Mojtaba Kamyab, Hamid Pezham, Vahideh Moradi, Taher Babaee, Batoul Bagheripour, Alireza Khani, Zahra Fattahi, Mohammed Flayyih Hassan Al-Falahi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Satisfaction with prosthetic devices is a key determinant of functional outcomes and quality of life in individuals with lower-limb amputation. Donning and doffing a prosthesis are essential daily activities that may influence user satisfaction and clinical decision-making. However, no validated Persian instrument is currently available to specifically assess these aspects. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Prosthesis Donning and Doffing Questionnaire (PDDQ) in individuals with transtibial amputation. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional repeated-measures study included 104 individuals with transtibial amputation. The translation and cultural adaptation followed established guidelines, including forward and backward translation, expert committee review, and pilot testing. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency and test–retest reliability (n = 33; 7–14-day interval). Concurrent validity was evaluated by examining correlations between the Persian version of the PDDQ (P-PDDQ) and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales. Known-groups validity was assessed based on different suspension systems. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha of the P-PDDQ obtained 0.62, showing close to acceptable range for internal consistency. Excellent test–retest reliability was demonstrated, with intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.91 to 0.99. Concurrent validity analysis showed no significant correlations between the total P-PDDQ score and Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales subscales, except for the functional satisfaction subscale ( P = 0.02). Known-groups validity revealed significant differences between participants using anatomical and pin/lock suspension systems in domains related to donning and doffing satisfaction. Conclusions: The P-PDDQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing satisfaction with prosthesis donning and doffing in individuals with transtibial amputation.

JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), La Trobe University (AU), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), California State University, Dominguez Hills (US), Middle Technical University (IQ), University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.