Development and initial validation of the Campus Food Aid Self-Assessment Tool

Objective: To develop and evaluate a survey instrument assessing campus responses to college student food insecurity. Participants: Experts in college student food insecurity and/or survey development participated in expert panel review. College representatives participated in cognitive interviewing and the pilot study. Methods: Expert panel review, cognitive interviewing, and exploratory factor analysis determined instrument face and content validity. Internal consistency tests assessed reliability. Results: Expert panelists (n = 7) and cognitive interviewing participants (n = 8) confirmed face and content validity. Sampling was not adequate to support factor analysis (KMO < 0.7). Internal consistency tests confirmed instrument reliability (Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.60). In the pilot study, campuses had the highest average scores for campus advocacy (M = 2.79, SD = 0.67). No schools reported the ability to meet all nutritional needs of food insecure students. Conclusions: This study establishes preliminary validation for an instrument for assessment of campus food insecurity response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of American College Health
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2026.2745118
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and initial validation of the Campus Food Aid Self-Assessment Tool

Sara Gonzalez, Alicia D. Powers, Chih-hsuan Wang
Journal of American College Health
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Development and initial validation of the Campus Food Aid Self-Assessment Tool

Sara Gonzalez, Alicia D. Powers, Chih-hsuan Wang
article en

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a survey instrument assessing campus responses to college student food insecurity. Participants: Experts in college student food insecurity and/or survey development participated in expert panel review. College representatives participated in cognitive interviewing and the pilot study. Methods: Expert panel review, cognitive interviewing, and exploratory factor analysis determined instrument face and content validity. Internal consistency tests assessed reliability. Results: Expert panelists (n = 7) and cognitive interviewing participants (n = 8) confirmed face and content validity. Sampling was not adequate to support factor analysis (KMO < 0.7). Internal consistency tests confirmed instrument reliability (Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.60). In the pilot study, campuses had the highest average scores for campus advocacy (M = 2.79, SD = 0.67). No schools reported the ability to meet all nutritional needs of food insecure students. Conclusions: This study establishes preliminary validation for an instrument for assessment of campus food insecurity response.

Journal of American College Health
Auburn University (US)
ECMC Foundation
Zero hunger, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.