The Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score

Aims: The Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) has been developed to capture the unique perspective of patients undergoing deformity correction. In this multiphase mixed method approach, face validity has previously been established. This study presents the next stage of validation and illustrates the evolution of this novel patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Methods: All patients aged ≥ 18 years, undergoing deformity correction, who met the inclusion criteria were recruited, between March 2021 and January 2025. Data were collected at significant timepoints over the patients' treatment journey. In accordance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the SLRS was investigated. Results: = 0.77, p < 0.001) and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire scales (pain and function, p < 0.001). Notably there was sufficient variability, ensuring this new tool is not entirely identical in scope. Divergent validity was confirmed, with no correlations between SLRS and sex, anatomical location, laterality, deformity, and implant. The scale was demonstrated to be reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.9 for pain, and combined ICC 0.78), indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach α score 0.89) and negligible floor-ceiling effects were noted. Responsiveness was established, confirming the instrument's sensitivity to accurately reflect clinically meaningful change in all domains, consistent with expected outcomes following deformity correction surgery (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study provides evidence of construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness for the SLRS. Field-test, through collaborative work, is necessary for further validation. This has the potential to deliver a unified outcome assessment tool in adult limb reconstruction surgery, to inform evidence-based clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bone & Joint Open
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.710.bjo-2026-0186.r1
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score

Elizabeth Khadija Tissingh, Anna Timms, Jonathan Wright, Gagori Bandopadhyay et al.
Bone & Joint Open
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

The Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score

Elizabeth Khadija Tissingh, Anna Timms, Jonathan Wright, Gagori Bandopadhyay, William David Goodier, Peter R Calder
article en

Abstract

Aims: The Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) has been developed to capture the unique perspective of patients undergoing deformity correction. In this multiphase mixed method approach, face validity has previously been established. This study presents the next stage of validation and illustrates the evolution of this novel patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Methods: All patients aged ≥ 18 years, undergoing deformity correction, who met the inclusion criteria were recruited, between March 2021 and January 2025. Data were collected at significant timepoints over the patients' treatment journey. In accordance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the SLRS was investigated. Results: = 0.77, p < 0.001) and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire scales (pain and function, p < 0.001). Notably there was sufficient variability, ensuring this new tool is not entirely identical in scope. Divergent validity was confirmed, with no correlations between SLRS and sex, anatomical location, laterality, deformity, and implant. The scale was demonstrated to be reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.9 for pain, and combined ICC 0.78), indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach α score 0.89) and negligible floor-ceiling effects were noted. Responsiveness was established, confirming the instrument's sensitivity to accurately reflect clinically meaningful change in all domains, consistent with expected outcomes following deformity correction surgery (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study provides evidence of construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness for the SLRS. Field-test, through collaborative work, is necessary for further validation. This has the potential to deliver a unified outcome assessment tool in adult limb reconstruction surgery, to inform evidence-based clinical care.

Bone & Joint OpenVol. 7(10)
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.