Emergency healthcare access for transient populations in mountainous environments: a scoping review

Abstract Background Mountain environments present substantial barriers to emergency healthcare delivery because of difficult terrain, variable weather, limited infrastructure, and prolonged transport times. These challenges are amplified when transient and mobile populations enter geographically constrained settings with limited emergency medical resources. This review mapped the barriers, facilitators, and stages of the emergency care pathway influencing emergency healthcare access for these populations. Methods A scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR. Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched for sources examining emergency healthcare access or delivery for transient or mobile populations in mountain, high-altitude, or rugged-terrain settings. Quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, geospatial, operational, and systems-level evidence was eligible. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were charted using a standardized extraction framework and synthesized descriptively. Results Of 737 identified records, 23 sources met the inclusion criteria. Included sources examined tourists, climbers, pilgrims, migrants, disaster-affected populations, and mass-gathering participants across diverse mountain regions. Common barriers included difficult terrain, limited roads, weather variability, altitude-related operational constraints, communication limitations, and insufficient emergency medical system capacity. Predictable surges associated with tourism, pilgrimage, and sporting events frequently strained local resources. Reported facilitators included helicopter emergency medical services, on-site medical clinics, specialized mountain search and rescue systems, telemedicine, drones, and geospatial planning tools. Delays occurred across multiple stages of care, including incident recognition, system activation, responder access, field care, evacuation, interfacility transfer, and definitive care. Conclusions Emergency healthcare access for transient and mobile populations in mountain environments is shaped by the interaction between geography, environmental exposure, system capacity, and population movement. Findings support a chain-of-care planning approach that addresses cumulative delays while accounting for terrain, weather, altitude, and predictable surge demand. Future research should prioritize standardized access measures, geospatial modeling, and evaluation of intervention effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-026-01711-4
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergency healthcare access for transient populations in mountainous environments: a scoping review

Nicolas Ray, Giacomo Strapazzon, Scott K. Summers, Craig Nuttall et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Emergency healthcare access for transient populations in mountainous environments: a scoping review

Nicolas Ray, Giacomo Strapazzon, Scott K. Summers, Craig Nuttall, Smriti Arora
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Mountain environments present substantial barriers to emergency healthcare delivery because of difficult terrain, variable weather, limited infrastructure, and prolonged transport times. These challenges are amplified when transient and mobile populations enter geographically constrained settings with limited emergency medical resources. This review mapped the barriers, facilitators, and stages of the emergency care pathway influencing emergency healthcare access for these populations. Methods A scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR. Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched for sources examining emergency healthcare access or delivery for transient or mobile populations in mountain, high-altitude, or rugged-terrain settings. Quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, geospatial, operational, and systems-level evidence was eligible. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Data were charted using a standardized extraction framework and synthesized descriptively. Results Of 737 identified records, 23 sources met the inclusion criteria. Included sources examined tourists, climbers, pilgrims, migrants, disaster-affected populations, and mass-gathering participants across diverse mountain regions. Common barriers included difficult terrain, limited roads, weather variability, altitude-related operational constraints, communication limitations, and insufficient emergency medical system capacity. Predictable surges associated with tourism, pilgrimage, and sporting events frequently strained local resources. Reported facilitators included helicopter emergency medical services, on-site medical clinics, specialized mountain search and rescue systems, telemedicine, drones, and geospatial planning tools. Delays occurred across multiple stages of care, including incident recognition, system activation, responder access, field care, evacuation, interfacility transfer, and definitive care. Conclusions Emergency healthcare access for transient and mobile populations in mountain environments is shaped by the interaction between geography, environmental exposure, system capacity, and population movement. Findings support a chain-of-care planning approach that addresses cumulative delays while accounting for terrain, weather, altitude, and predictable surge demand. Future research should prioritize standardized access measures, geospatial modeling, and evaluation of intervention effectiveness.

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Brigham Young University (US), University of Geneva (CH), Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine (IT), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.