Association between xerostomia and peri‐implant health: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Dental implants are a long-term and reliable solution to replace missing dentition, but subject to different patient-related and biological changes that could alter its success. Xerostomia, or the alteration of the normal salivary flow, can impair oral function and potentially affect the success of any treatment, including implant outcomes. The purpose of this study is to study the association between xerostomia and peri-implantitis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using records of patients who received dental implants between 2010 and 2023 at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry. The patients were divided into two groups: the xerostomia group and the non-xerostomia group. Implant level assessment included the presence of peri-implantitis and marginal bone loss, restoration type, cement-retained or screw retained, and the depth of restoration margin. Patient-level assessment included sex, age, smoking history, medical conditions, and maintenance visit frequency. Univariable and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between peri-implantitis and patient-level and other implant-related variables. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included, with 46 patients reporting xerostomia. The results showed no independent association between xerostomia and peri-implantitis in either univariable or multivariable analyzes. The history of periodontitis and cement-retained restorations were significant predictors for peri-implantitis. Age was significant in univariable analysis but lost significance in the adjusted model. The frequency of maintenance visits was associated with peri-implantitis in univariable analysis but lost significance in multivariable analysis. Sex, smoking, and diabetes mellitus were not significantly associated with peri-implantitis. CONCLUSION: Xerostomia alone does not increase the risk of peri-implantitis. A history of periodontitis, the use of cement-retained prosthesis, and longer follow-up duration after prosthetic loading were associated with unfavorable implant outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Periodontology
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.70192
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between xerostomia and peri‐implant health: A retrospective cohort study

Hom‐Lay Wang, Parham Hazrati, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Shahad Alhazmi et al.
Journal of Periodontology
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Association between xerostomia and peri‐implant health: A retrospective cohort study

Hom‐Lay Wang, Parham Hazrati, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Shahad Alhazmi, Sahar Baniameri, Fatemeh SamavatiJame, Yousef Taha Y. Amrou
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dental implants are a long-term and reliable solution to replace missing dentition, but subject to different patient-related and biological changes that could alter its success. Xerostomia, or the alteration of the normal salivary flow, can impair oral function and potentially affect the success of any treatment, including implant outcomes. The purpose of this study is to study the association between xerostomia and peri-implantitis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using records of patients who received dental implants between 2010 and 2023 at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry. The patients were divided into two groups: the xerostomia group and the non-xerostomia group. Implant level assessment included the presence of peri-implantitis and marginal bone loss, restoration type, cement-retained or screw retained, and the depth of restoration margin. Patient-level assessment included sex, age, smoking history, medical conditions, and maintenance visit frequency. Univariable and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between peri-implantitis and patient-level and other implant-related variables. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included, with 46 patients reporting xerostomia. The results showed no independent association between xerostomia and peri-implantitis in either univariable or multivariable analyzes. The history of periodontitis and cement-retained restorations were significant predictors for peri-implantitis. Age was significant in univariable analysis but lost significance in the adjusted model. The frequency of maintenance visits was associated with peri-implantitis in univariable analysis but lost significance in multivariable analysis. Sex, smoking, and diabetes mellitus were not significantly associated with peri-implantitis. CONCLUSION: Xerostomia alone does not increase the risk of peri-implantitis. A history of periodontitis, the use of cement-retained prosthesis, and longer follow-up duration after prosthetic loading were associated with unfavorable implant outcomes.

Journal of Periodontology
Harvard University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Nova Southeastern University (US), University of Michigan (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.