Hepatocellular Carcinoma Management in the Era of Immunotherapy: Retrospective Pilot Study Based on Real-Life Experience Data in Unselected Patients

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality, and many patients present with intermediate or advanced disease. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an established treatment; however, its proangiogenic effects support the use of combination therapy. Combinations of TACE with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown a promising antitumor activity. The objective of this study was to describe post-treatment mRECIST response patterns of TACE alone, TACE plus lenvatinib and pembrolizumab, and TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab for HCC. Methods: This multicentre retrospective, non-randomized pilot study included 25 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC treated with TACE alone (n = 10), TACE–lenvatinib–pembrolizumab (n = 7), or TACE–atezolizumab–bevacizumab (n = 8). The primary outcome was first post-treatment mRECIST response. ORR and DCR were calculated descriptively. Secondary outcomes included imaging interval, TACE exposure, repeat TACE, ALBI change, and OS, estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease occurred in 30.0%, 30.0%, 10.0%, and 30.0% after TACE alone, 14.3%, 28.6%, 57.1%, and 0% after TACE–lenvatinib–pembrolizumab, and 0%, 37.5%, 0%, and 62.5% after TACE–atezolizumab–bevacizumab. ORR/DCR were 60.0%/70.0%, 42.9%/100.0%, and 37.5%/37.5%, respectively. Median imaging intervals were 38.0, 25.0, and 20.0 months. ALBI-grade worsening occurred in 30.0%, 42.9%, and 37.5%; 1-year OS was 78.8%, 83.3%, and 50.0%, respectively. Conclusions: mRECIST response patterns were heterogeneous. Baseline liver-function imbalance, small groups, and non-randomized allocation preclude comparative efficacy inference. Larger prospective studies should standardize treatment sequencing, imaging, liver function assessment, safety monitoring, and survival evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord8040067
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Management in the Era of Immunotherapy: Retrospective Pilot Study Based on Real-Life Experience Data in Unselected Patients

Jessica Christanti, Rio Hermawan, Sri Inggriani, Fabianus Anugrah Pratama et al.
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Management in the Era of Immunotherapy: Retrospective Pilot Study Based on Real-Life Experience Data in Unselected Patients

Jessica Christanti, Rio Hermawan, Sri Inggriani, Fabianus Anugrah Pratama, Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana, Callistus Bruce Henfry Sulay, Alexandro Wiyanda
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality, and many patients present with intermediate or advanced disease. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an established treatment; however, its proangiogenic effects support the use of combination therapy. Combinations of TACE with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown a promising antitumor activity. The objective of this study was to describe post-treatment mRECIST response patterns of TACE alone, TACE plus lenvatinib and pembrolizumab, and TACE plus atezolizumab and bevacizumab for HCC. Methods: This multicentre retrospective, non-randomized pilot study included 25 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC treated with TACE alone (n = 10), TACE–lenvatinib–pembrolizumab (n = 7), or TACE–atezolizumab–bevacizumab (n = 8). The primary outcome was first post-treatment mRECIST response. ORR and DCR were calculated descriptively. Secondary outcomes included imaging interval, TACE exposure, repeat TACE, ALBI change, and OS, estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease occurred in 30.0%, 30.0%, 10.0%, and 30.0% after TACE alone, 14.3%, 28.6%, 57.1%, and 0% after TACE–lenvatinib–pembrolizumab, and 0%, 37.5%, 0%, and 62.5% after TACE–atezolizumab–bevacizumab. ORR/DCR were 60.0%/70.0%, 42.9%/100.0%, and 37.5%/37.5%, respectively. Median imaging intervals were 38.0, 25.0, and 20.0 months. ALBI-grade worsening occurred in 30.0%, 42.9%, and 37.5%; 1-year OS was 78.8%, 83.3%, and 50.0%, respectively. Conclusions: mRECIST response patterns were heterogeneous. Baseline liver-function imbalance, small groups, and non-randomized allocation preclude comparative efficacy inference. Larger prospective studies should standardize treatment sequencing, imaging, liver function assessment, safety monitoring, and survival evaluation.

Gastrointestinal DisordersVol. 8(4)
Pelita Harapan University (ID), Soegijapranata Catholic University (ID), Dharmais Cancer Hospital (ID), Siloam Eye Hospital (KR), Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.