Mycofiltration for Metal Removal in Underperforming Wastewater Treatment Plants: Regulatory Implications for South Africa

To improve wastewater treatment, technologies such as mycofiltration, i.e., the treatment of contaminated water by passing it through a network of fungal mycelia, can be employed. This study sought to evaluate the performance of a local wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in the removal of selected metals, perform mycofiltration on the wastewater, and assess metal removal in the filtrate. Wastewater influent and effluent samples were collected and analysed for Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), Aluminium (Al), Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Cobalt (Co), Copper (Cu), Iron (Fe), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Mercury (Hg), Molybdenum (Mo), Nickel (Ni), Phosphorus (P), Selenium (Se), Titanium (Ti) and Zinc (Zn). A Pleurotus ostreatus mycofilter was cultured and packed into Pyrex columns (3.3 x 15 cm). Wastewater samples were mycofiltered at a constant flow rate, and metal removal efficiency was assessed. The wastewater quality index (WWQI) was also calculated. The WWTP performed poorly, as only Na, Fe, and P had lower levels in the effluent compared to the influent. There were no changes between influent and effluent metal concentrations for most metals. After mycofiltration of the wastewater influent, P, Hg, Na, Fe, K and Cu were removed with an efficiency of 99%, 50%, 48%, 31%, 30%, and 23%, respectively. Mycofiltration of the wastewater effluent removed P, K, Pb, Hg and Fe with an efficiency of 99%, 52%, 51%, 51% and 10%, respectively. Mycofiltration could not remove metals such as Ca, Cr and Cd. The WWQI for the WWTP effluent, the mycofiltered influent and the mycofiltered effluent were 604.6, 582.2, and 548.0, respectively. Mycofiltration thus slightly improved wastewater quality as denoted by the lower indices. The findings demonstrate the potential use of mycofiltration as a science-informed bioaugmentation strategy for WWTPs to enhance regulatory compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag166
Primary Topic
Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mycofiltration for Metal Removal in Underperforming Wastewater Treatment Plants: Regulatory Implications for South Africa

Patricks Voua Otomo, Sanele Michelle Mnkandla, Norah Basopo
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
article

Mycofiltration for Metal Removal in Underperforming Wastewater Treatment Plants: Regulatory Implications for South Africa

Patricks Voua Otomo, Sanele Michelle Mnkandla, Norah Basopo
article en

Abstract

To improve wastewater treatment, technologies such as mycofiltration, i.e., the treatment of contaminated water by passing it through a network of fungal mycelia, can be employed. This study sought to evaluate the performance of a local wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in the removal of selected metals, perform mycofiltration on the wastewater, and assess metal removal in the filtrate. Wastewater influent and effluent samples were collected and analysed for Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), Aluminium (Al), Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Cobalt (Co), Copper (Cu), Iron (Fe), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Mercury (Hg), Molybdenum (Mo), Nickel (Ni), Phosphorus (P), Selenium (Se), Titanium (Ti) and Zinc (Zn). A Pleurotus ostreatus mycofilter was cultured and packed into Pyrex columns (3.3 x 15 cm). Wastewater samples were mycofiltered at a constant flow rate, and metal removal efficiency was assessed. The wastewater quality index (WWQI) was also calculated. The WWTP performed poorly, as only Na, Fe, and P had lower levels in the effluent compared to the influent. There were no changes between influent and effluent metal concentrations for most metals. After mycofiltration of the wastewater influent, P, Hg, Na, Fe, K and Cu were removed with an efficiency of 99%, 50%, 48%, 31%, 30%, and 23%, respectively. Mycofiltration of the wastewater effluent removed P, K, Pb, Hg and Fe with an efficiency of 99%, 52%, 51%, 51% and 10%, respectively. Mycofiltration could not remove metals such as Ca, Cr and Cd. The WWQI for the WWTP effluent, the mycofiltered influent and the mycofiltered effluent were 604.6, 582.2, and 548.0, respectively. Mycofiltration thus slightly improved wastewater quality as denoted by the lower indices. The findings demonstrate the potential use of mycofiltration as a science-informed bioaugmentation strategy for WWTPs to enhance regulatory compliance.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
University of the Free State (ZA), National University of Science and Technology (ZW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.