Sensor-assisted firing execution (SAFE) cut: a quantitatively standardized technique for pancreatic transection in robotic distal pancreatectomy

Abstract Purpose In robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), the lack of haptic feedback and delegation of stapler firing to the bedside assistant make compression quality during transection highly operator-dependent. We describe the “SAFE Cut” (Sensor-Assisted Firing Execution) technique, a quantitatively standardized protocol that converts the subjective “wait-and-fire” judgment into an objective, device-guided workflow. Methods A smart stapler displays tissue resistance as nine stratifications across three color-coded Zones (1–1 to 3–3). A mandatory pre-firing wait (immediate to 60 s) was assigned to each segment and re-applied at every incremental firing step. We reviewed 31 consecutive patients undergoing RDP with the SAFE Cut technique, analyzing prospectively recorded Zone observations for all firing steps. Results The protocol was completed without protocol-related conversion, repositioning, or technical failure in all 31 patients (31 of 31); in every case the stapler was operated by a bedside trainee. Median transection time was 13.3 min (8.7–23.0). CR-POPF occurred in 1 patient (3.2%), with no Grade C fistula and no 90-day mortality. Across 1,179 firing steps, Zone 1 occurred in 940 (79.7%) and Zone 2 in 239 (20.3%); Zone 3 never occurred. Because each step advances the stapler to new tissue, consecutive readings sample different segments; the step after a Zone 2 reading displayed Zone 1 in 136 of 239 events (56.9%). Conclusion The SAFE Cut technique is feasible: the Zone-guided protocol was completed in every patient by a bedside trainee, making the previously hidden heterogeneity of tissue resistance quantifiable. This study was not designed to test fistula prevention; the CR-POPF rate was low, but a study of this size cannot establish efficacy, and whether the approach reduces fistula, and whether comparably low rates recur in other cohorts, needs prospective study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04332-8
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensor-assisted firing execution (SAFE) cut: a quantitatively standardized technique for pancreatic transection in robotic distal pancreatectomy

Hiroko Okinaga, Nobuyuki Takemura, Riki Ninomiya, Yasuji Seyama et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Sensor-assisted firing execution (SAFE) cut: a quantitatively standardized technique for pancreatic transection in robotic distal pancreatectomy

Hiroko Okinaga, Nobuyuki Takemura, Riki Ninomiya, Yasuji Seyama, Mei Nakamura, Yoshifumi Beck, Masanao Kurata, Tomoaki Sawano
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose In robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), the lack of haptic feedback and delegation of stapler firing to the bedside assistant make compression quality during transection highly operator-dependent. We describe the “SAFE Cut” (Sensor-Assisted Firing Execution) technique, a quantitatively standardized protocol that converts the subjective “wait-and-fire” judgment into an objective, device-guided workflow. Methods A smart stapler displays tissue resistance as nine stratifications across three color-coded Zones (1–1 to 3–3). A mandatory pre-firing wait (immediate to 60 s) was assigned to each segment and re-applied at every incremental firing step. We reviewed 31 consecutive patients undergoing RDP with the SAFE Cut technique, analyzing prospectively recorded Zone observations for all firing steps. Results The protocol was completed without protocol-related conversion, repositioning, or technical failure in all 31 patients (31 of 31); in every case the stapler was operated by a bedside trainee. Median transection time was 13.3 min (8.7–23.0). CR-POPF occurred in 1 patient (3.2%), with no Grade C fistula and no 90-day mortality. Across 1,179 firing steps, Zone 1 occurred in 940 (79.7%) and Zone 2 in 239 (20.3%); Zone 3 never occurred. Because each step advances the stapler to new tissue, consecutive readings sample different segments; the step after a Zone 2 reading displayed Zone 1 in 136 of 239 events (56.9%). Conclusion The SAFE Cut technique is feasible: the Zone-guided protocol was completed in every patient by a bedside trainee, making the previously hidden heterogeneity of tissue resistance quantifiable. This study was not designed to test fistula prevention; the CR-POPF rate was low, but a study of this size cannot establish efficacy, and whether the approach reduces fistula, and whether comparably low rates recur in other cohorts, needs prospective study.

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital (JP), Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.