Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Advanced Practice Clinicians: Identifying a Critical Gap in Palliative Care Measurement Instruments

ContextMedical advancements have led to patients living longer, often with serious illness(es), making palliative care involvement prudent. To address the deficit of specialty palliative care clinicians, the integration of advanced practice clinicians (APCs) alongside physicians is a critical workforce shortage solution. However, a gap exists in the standardized methods for evaluation of patient satisfaction with APCs in this setting.ObjectivesThis paper evaluates the existing instruments measuring patient satisfaction with APCs to highlight the current gap in palliative care-specific tools and assess their potential for adaptation.MethodsTo identify appropriate instruments focused on patient satisfaction with APCs a literature review was completed searching for instruments pertaining to patient experience and satisfaction with APCs. Three relevant instruments were identified: the Nurse Practitioner Satisfaction Survey (NPSS), the Art of Medicine Survey, and Patient Satisfaction Survey with Physician Assistants in a Fast Track Emergency Department.ResultsOf these, only the NPSS underwent formal psychometric testing, demonstrating both validity and internal consistency.ConclusionsThe review identified a paradox in which the validated instrument, NPSS, was utilized much less than the non-validated Art of Medicine survey. This review also highlights a significant gap in validated and reliable instruments to measure patient satisfaction with APCs, particularly in the palliative care context. There is a critical need to develop or adapt a psychometrically sound instrument for the palliative care patient population to ensure high-quality, patient-centered care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261498818
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Advanced Practice Clinicians: Identifying a Critical Gap in Palliative Care Measurement Instruments

Ryan Baldeo
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Advanced Practice Clinicians: Identifying a Critical Gap in Palliative Care Measurement Instruments

Ryan Baldeo
article en

Abstract

ContextMedical advancements have led to patients living longer, often with serious illness(es), making palliative care involvement prudent. To address the deficit of specialty palliative care clinicians, the integration of advanced practice clinicians (APCs) alongside physicians is a critical workforce shortage solution. However, a gap exists in the standardized methods for evaluation of patient satisfaction with APCs in this setting.ObjectivesThis paper evaluates the existing instruments measuring patient satisfaction with APCs to highlight the current gap in palliative care-specific tools and assess their potential for adaptation.MethodsTo identify appropriate instruments focused on patient satisfaction with APCs a literature review was completed searching for instruments pertaining to patient experience and satisfaction with APCs. Three relevant instruments were identified: the Nurse Practitioner Satisfaction Survey (NPSS), the Art of Medicine Survey, and Patient Satisfaction Survey with Physician Assistants in a Fast Track Emergency Department.ResultsOf these, only the NPSS underwent formal psychometric testing, demonstrating both validity and internal consistency.ConclusionsThe review identified a paradox in which the validated instrument, NPSS, was utilized much less than the non-validated Art of Medicine survey. This review also highlights a significant gap in validated and reliable instruments to measure patient satisfaction with APCs, particularly in the palliative care context. There is a critical need to develop or adapt a psychometrically sound instrument for the palliative care patient population to ensure high-quality, patient-centered care.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Primary Health Care (QA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.