Knowledge diversity and disruptive innovation: the contrasting moderating effects of technology cycle in the fuel cell sector

Knowledge diversity provides firms with opportunities to recombine heterogeneous knowledge, yet its implications for disruptive innovation depend on both the source of diversity and the temporal characteristics of technological development. This study distinguishes knowledge diversity into two dimensions: technology-source knowledge diversity (TD) and firm-source knowledge diversity (FD). Using USPTO patent data from the fuel cell sector, we examine their effects on disruptive innovation and the moderating role of the technology cycle. Results show that both TD and FD are negatively associated with disruptive innovation. More importantly, the technology cycle exerts contrasting moderating effects: a longer technology cycle weakens the negative relationship between TD and disruptive innovation but strengthens the negative relationship between FD and disruptive innovation. These findings demonstrate that knowledge diversity is not a homogeneous construct and that its implications for disruptive innovation depend on where knowledge heterogeneity resides and on the temporal characteristics of the underlying technology. This study contributes to the literature on knowledge recombination and disruptive innovation by identifying the technology cycle as an important boundary condition that operates differently across technological and organisational dimensions of knowledge diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Technology Innovation
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2026.2747030
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge diversity and disruptive innovation: the contrasting moderating effects of technology cycle in the fuel cell sector

Junguo Shi, Shanshan Dou, Kun Jiang, Yang Liu
Asian Journal of Technology Innovation
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Knowledge diversity and disruptive innovation: the contrasting moderating effects of technology cycle in the fuel cell sector

Junguo Shi, Shanshan Dou, Kun Jiang, Yang Liu
article en

Abstract

Knowledge diversity provides firms with opportunities to recombine heterogeneous knowledge, yet its implications for disruptive innovation depend on both the source of diversity and the temporal characteristics of technological development. This study distinguishes knowledge diversity into two dimensions: technology-source knowledge diversity (TD) and firm-source knowledge diversity (FD). Using USPTO patent data from the fuel cell sector, we examine their effects on disruptive innovation and the moderating role of the technology cycle. Results show that both TD and FD are negatively associated with disruptive innovation. More importantly, the technology cycle exerts contrasting moderating effects: a longer technology cycle weakens the negative relationship between TD and disruptive innovation but strengthens the negative relationship between FD and disruptive innovation. These findings demonstrate that knowledge diversity is not a homogeneous construct and that its implications for disruptive innovation depend on where knowledge heterogeneity resides and on the temporal characteristics of the underlying technology. This study contributes to the literature on knowledge recombination and disruptive innovation by identifying the technology cycle as an important boundary condition that operates differently across technological and organisational dimensions of knowledge diversity.

Asian Journal of Technology Innovation
Jiangsu University (CN), Wuxi Taihu University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.