Real-world before-and-after evaluation of AI support for lung cancer diagnosis at three US lung nodule clinics

BACKGROUND: Health systems and payers require evidence that artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled decision support improves care delivery. Integrating AI into lung nodule management pathways may streamline workflows, improve identification and triage of patients with pulmonary nodules, and enable earlier lung cancer diagnosis. Yet real-world evidence of clinical utility remains limited. This study evaluated the impact of implementing commercially available AI software to support the lung nodule and lung cancer care pathway across three US health systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A real-world before-and-after study compared clinic activity during matched 12.5-month pre-implementation and post-implementation periods at three US lung nodule clinics. Primary outcomes were the number of new patients and the number of patients undergoing at least one invasive procedure. Secondary outcomes were numbers of lung cancers and early-stage (stages I-II) lung cancers, and time from baseline CT to diagnosis. Analyses used Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests, with medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) reported for continuous measures. RESULTS: Across sites, new patients increased from 138 before to 232 after implementation, equivalent to 11.0 to 18.6 patients per month (p = 0.0002), with the median rising from 9 (IQR 7-14) to 16 (IQR 13-21) patients. Monthly patients undergoing at least one invasive procedure increased from 4.9 to 8.0 (p = 0.0085). Monthly cancers increased from 3.0 to 3.8 (p = 0.3242), while monthly early-stage cancers rose from 1.4 to 2.4 (p = 0.125). Median time to diagnosis was 58 days (IQR 33-158) before and 57 days (IQR 27-85) after implementation (p = 0.26), with IQR narrowing from 125 days to 58 days. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the AI-enabled software was associated with significantly increased throughput of lung nodule patients and procedural volume. These results, observed prospectively post-implementation, suggest AI-assisted identification and triage can expand access to timely specialist review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358655
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world before-and-after evaluation of AI support for lung cancer diagnosis at three US lung nodule clinics

Lisa Petricca, Catarina Santos, Sarah Dean, Annika Rings et al.
PLoS ONE
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Real-world before-and-after evaluation of AI support for lung cancer diagnosis at three US lung nodule clinics

Lisa Petricca, Catarina Santos, Sarah Dean, Annika Rings, Garrett Fiscus, L. Pickup, Amit Borah, Omar M. Ibrahim, Kenneth Adam Lee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health systems and payers require evidence that artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled decision support improves care delivery. Integrating AI into lung nodule management pathways may streamline workflows, improve identification and triage of patients with pulmonary nodules, and enable earlier lung cancer diagnosis. Yet real-world evidence of clinical utility remains limited. This study evaluated the impact of implementing commercially available AI software to support the lung nodule and lung cancer care pathway across three US health systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A real-world before-and-after study compared clinic activity during matched 12.5-month pre-implementation and post-implementation periods at three US lung nodule clinics. Primary outcomes were the number of new patients and the number of patients undergoing at least one invasive procedure. Secondary outcomes were numbers of lung cancers and early-stage (stages I-II) lung cancers, and time from baseline CT to diagnosis. Analyses used Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests, with medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) reported for continuous measures. RESULTS: Across sites, new patients increased from 138 before to 232 after implementation, equivalent to 11.0 to 18.6 patients per month (p = 0.0002), with the median rising from 9 (IQR 7-14) to 16 (IQR 13-21) patients. Monthly patients undergoing at least one invasive procedure increased from 4.9 to 8.0 (p = 0.0085). Monthly cancers increased from 3.0 to 3.8 (p = 0.3242), while monthly early-stage cancers rose from 1.4 to 2.4 (p = 0.125). Median time to diagnosis was 58 days (IQR 33-158) before and 57 days (IQR 27-85) after implementation (p = 0.26), with IQR narrowing from 125 days to 58 days. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the AI-enabled software was associated with significantly increased throughput of lung nodule patients and procedural volume. These results, observed prospectively post-implementation, suggest AI-assisted identification and triage can expand access to timely specialist review.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
Jupiter Medical Center (US), AtlantiCare (US)
Intuitive Surgical, Johnson and Johnson
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.