Use of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Guide Prognosis and Management in Older Adults: Is There an Age Limit?

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging is used to guide risk stratification and revascularization decisions. We aimed to determine whether the prognostic value of ischemia on myocardial perfusion imaging and the association with early revascularization (ER) and outcomes differ across age groups. METHODS: We included 73 038 patients who underwent single photon emission computed tomography (n=45 252) or positron emission tomography (n=27 786) myocardial perfusion imaging across 20 sites from 2009 to 2024. ER was defined as revascularization within 90 days post-myocardial perfusion imaging. Propensity score-adjusted Cox models evaluated the interaction between age, ischemic burden (myocardial flow reserve for positron emission tomography), and ER for the primary outcome of all-cause death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years; 45.3% were <65, 31.5% were 65 to 74, 19.1% were 75 to 84, and 4.2% were ≥85. ER was performed in 6.1%, rising to 7.0% in those aged 75 to 84 years and decreasing to 6.5% in those aged ≥85 years. During a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 10 757 deaths/myocardial infarctions occurred. Increasing ischemia was associated with lower event rates after ER versus medical therapy across most age groups, with no significant continuous age-ischemia-ER interaction ( P =0.748). In an exploratory analysis of 3031 patients aged ≥85 years, this association appeared attenuated (hazard ratio for ischemia >10%: 0.90 [0.64–1.26]), although precision was limited, likely reflecting, in part, the small number of patients undergoing ER (n=198). Among positron emission tomography patients, the myocardial flow reserve×ER association did not vary with age (3-way interaction P =0.689). In analyses excluding patients with ER, ischemia remained prognostic in all age groups, though its associated risk declined with advancing age. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemia remains prognostic across all ages and may help identify candidates who have improved outcomes with ER. In an exploratory analysis, this association appeared attenuated in patients aged ≥85 years, a hypothesis-generating observation. Positron emission tomography-derived myocardial flow reserve may provide complementary physiological information for treatment selection in older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.126.019932
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Guide Prognosis and Management in Older Adults: Is There an Age Limit?

Julian Halcox, Isabel Carvajal-Juárez, Leandro N. Slipczuk, Aakash Dhananjay Shanbhag et al.
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Use of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Guide Prognosis and Management in Older Adults: Is There an Age Limit?

Julian Halcox, Isabel Carvajal-Juárez, Leandro N. Slipczuk, Aakash Dhananjay Shanbhag, Mark H. Lemley, René R. Sevag Packard, Mouaz Husayn Al-Mallah, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Attila Fehér, M. Timothy Hauser, Robert J.H. Miller, Samuel B. Wopperer, Andrew Jeffrey Einstein, Sharmila Dorbala, Philipp Antonio Kaufmann, Damini Dey, Ronny R. Buechel, Krishna Patel, Terrence David Ruddy, Wanda Acampa, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Stacey Knight, Tali Sharir, Piotr J. Slomka, Edward Joseph Miller, Thomas L. Rosamond, Daniel S. Berman, Giselle Ramirez, MAIANA LOURENÇO BENVINDO DA ROCHA MARTINS, Timothy M. Bateman, Joanna X. Liang, Erick Alexanderson
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging is used to guide risk stratification and revascularization decisions. We aimed to determine whether the prognostic value of ischemia on myocardial perfusion imaging and the association with early revascularization (ER) and outcomes differ across age groups. METHODS: We included 73 038 patients who underwent single photon emission computed tomography (n=45 252) or positron emission tomography (n=27 786) myocardial perfusion imaging across 20 sites from 2009 to 2024. ER was defined as revascularization within 90 days post-myocardial perfusion imaging. Propensity score-adjusted Cox models evaluated the interaction between age, ischemic burden (myocardial flow reserve for positron emission tomography), and ER for the primary outcome of all-cause death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years; 45.3% were <65, 31.5% were 65 to 74, 19.1% were 75 to 84, and 4.2% were ≥85. ER was performed in 6.1%, rising to 7.0% in those aged 75 to 84 years and decreasing to 6.5% in those aged ≥85 years. During a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 10 757 deaths/myocardial infarctions occurred. Increasing ischemia was associated with lower event rates after ER versus medical therapy across most age groups, with no significant continuous age-ischemia-ER interaction ( P =0.748). In an exploratory analysis of 3031 patients aged ≥85 years, this association appeared attenuated (hazard ratio for ischemia >10%: 0.90 [0.64–1.26]), although precision was limited, likely reflecting, in part, the small number of patients undergoing ER (n=198). Among positron emission tomography patients, the myocardial flow reserve×ER association did not vary with age (3-way interaction P =0.689). In analyses excluding patients with ER, ischemia remained prognostic in all age groups, though its associated risk declined with advancing age. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemia remains prognostic across all ages and may help identify candidates who have improved outcomes with ER. In an exploratory analysis, this association appeared attenuated in patients aged ≥85 years, a hypothesis-generating observation. Positron emission tomography-derived myocardial flow reserve may provide complementary physiological information for treatment selection in older adults.

Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), West Los Angeles College (US), Houston Methodist (US), Mayo Clinic (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Calgary (CA), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Assuta Medical Center (IL), Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center (US), Intermountain Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), Swansea University (GB), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Montefiore Health System (US), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Oklahoma Heart Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Instituto Nacional de Cardiología (MX), Ottawa Heart Institute (CA), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.