Immersive Technologies in Sport Spectatorship: A Scoping Review of Psychological Responses and Behavioral Intentions

Immersive technologies are reshaping sport spectatorship by changing how spectators perceive events, allocate attention, experience emotions, and form behavioral responses. Yet empirical research on virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and 360-degree video remains fragmented in terms of technologies, theories, methods, and outcomes. This scoping review maps research on immersive technologies in sport spectatorship, focusing on experiential and psychological responses, behavioral intentions, and future research directions. Guided by PRISMA-ScR, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest for English-language peer-reviewed journal articles and supplemented the database search with a citation search. Thirty-four empirical journal articles met the inclusion criteria. VR was the most frequently examined technology. AR has been the subject of a growing amount of research recently. MR and 360-degree video were both underrepresented in the reviewed literature. Most articles used quantitative designs, particularly with post-exposure and online surveys, and were concentrated in a few countries and participant groups. The literature addressed adoption or resistance, immersive experience, psychological responses, and behavioral intentions. The reviewed articles examined experiential constructs such as presence, telepresence, flow, and engagement; cognitive responses such as attention and cognitive load; affective responses such as arousal and enjoyment; evaluative responses such as satisfaction and attitude; and negative responses such as irritation. Overall, the reviewed literature primarily examined the associations between immersive technology types and technology-related features, spectators’ experiential and psychological responses, and behavioral intentions such as continuance intention, word of mouth, revisit intention, intention to pay. Evidence concerning actual long-term spectator behavior remains limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16101903
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immersive Technologies in Sport Spectatorship: A Scoping Review of Psychological Responses and Behavioral Intentions

Kyungun Ryan Kim, Daehwan Kim, Yiming Xiong
Behavioral Sciences
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Immersive Technologies in Sport Spectatorship: A Scoping Review of Psychological Responses and Behavioral Intentions

Kyungun Ryan Kim, Daehwan Kim, Yiming Xiong
article en

Abstract

Immersive technologies are reshaping sport spectatorship by changing how spectators perceive events, allocate attention, experience emotions, and form behavioral responses. Yet empirical research on virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and 360-degree video remains fragmented in terms of technologies, theories, methods, and outcomes. This scoping review maps research on immersive technologies in sport spectatorship, focusing on experiential and psychological responses, behavioral intentions, and future research directions. Guided by PRISMA-ScR, we searched Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest for English-language peer-reviewed journal articles and supplemented the database search with a citation search. Thirty-four empirical journal articles met the inclusion criteria. VR was the most frequently examined technology. AR has been the subject of a growing amount of research recently. MR and 360-degree video were both underrepresented in the reviewed literature. Most articles used quantitative designs, particularly with post-exposure and online surveys, and were concentrated in a few countries and participant groups. The literature addressed adoption or resistance, immersive experience, psychological responses, and behavioral intentions. The reviewed articles examined experiential constructs such as presence, telepresence, flow, and engagement; cognitive responses such as attention and cognitive load; affective responses such as arousal and enjoyment; evaluative responses such as satisfaction and attitude; and negative responses such as irritation. Overall, the reviewed literature primarily examined the associations between immersive technology types and technology-related features, spectators’ experiential and psychological responses, and behavioral intentions such as continuance intention, word of mouth, revisit intention, intention to pay. Evidence concerning actual long-term spectator behavior remains limited.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(10)
University of Central Missouri (US), Pukyong National University (KR)
Pukyong National University
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.