Policy Diffusion Under Interacting Institutional Pressures: Distinguishing Industrial-Structure and GDP-Feasibility Learning in China

The adoption of provincial carbon-trading market-construction policies in China expanded rapidly before a five-year hiatus in new qualifying policies. This study examines how industrial-structure and GDP-feasibility learning cues relate to diffusion alongside pilot designation, regional competition, and media attention. Directed provincial-pair models cover the lagged-covariate period of 2013–2022 within a descriptive observation window of 2012–2022. Industrial-structure learning has a positive association in the additive model, and the highest signed-gap quartile differs positively from the lowest quartile, whereas GDP-feasibility learning is not supported. The industrial association becomes imprecise when national-market phases are included, and multiple-testing adjustments further qualify the evidence. Interaction estimates do not consistently support signal interference. The hiatus coincides with national-market construction and a changing population of nonadopters. Exploratory provincial scenarios also remain uncertain. These findings distinguish structural learning cues from economic-capacity cues while emphasizing that nationwide institutional change must be considered when interpreting provincial diffusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182010469
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Diffusion Under Interacting Institutional Pressures: Distinguishing Industrial-Structure and GDP-Feasibility Learning in China

Xuwei Tang, Feng Xue, Danhua Liu, Qingyuan Jiang
Sustainability
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Policy Diffusion Under Interacting Institutional Pressures: Distinguishing Industrial-Structure and GDP-Feasibility Learning in China

Xuwei Tang, Feng Xue, Danhua Liu, Qingyuan Jiang
article en

Abstract

The adoption of provincial carbon-trading market-construction policies in China expanded rapidly before a five-year hiatus in new qualifying policies. This study examines how industrial-structure and GDP-feasibility learning cues relate to diffusion alongside pilot designation, regional competition, and media attention. Directed provincial-pair models cover the lagged-covariate period of 2013–2022 within a descriptive observation window of 2012–2022. Industrial-structure learning has a positive association in the additive model, and the highest signed-gap quartile differs positively from the lowest quartile, whereas GDP-feasibility learning is not supported. The industrial association becomes imprecise when national-market phases are included, and multiple-testing adjustments further qualify the evidence. Interaction estimates do not consistently support signal interference. The hiatus coincides with national-market construction and a changing population of nonadopters. Exploratory provincial scenarios also remain uncertain. These findings distinguish structural learning cues from economic-capacity cues while emphasizing that nationwide institutional change must be considered when interpreting provincial diffusion.

SustainabilityVol. 18(20)
Waseda University (JP), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), PowerChina (China) (CN), Jinan Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute (China) (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.