International Comparison of the Singapore ETF Ecosystem
This paper compares Singapore’s exchange-traded fund (ETF) ecosystem with those of the United States, Mainland China, Hong Kong, Europe, Taiwan and selected ASEAN markets. It treats the ETF market as an institutional ecosystem connecting issuers, authorized participants, market makers, index and data providers, trading and clearing infrastructure, regulation and investor channels. Comparative institutional analysis is organized around autonomy, efficiency, inclusiveness and sustainability: the location and accountability of critical capabilities, the quality and cost of market functioning, investor access, and continuity across market cycles. Dated market statistics and regulatory documents reveal different arrangements for coordinating these functions. For Singapore, recent growth in assets, trading and digital and retirement-channel participation coexists with concentrated exchange trading; these observations do not establish a market-wide liquidity deficit or its causes. The paper develops an ‘openly embedded’ model in which international participation complements locally anchored operational capabilities and supervisory interfaces. It proposes a staged roadmap covering core ETF liquidity, issuer and intermediary capacity, investor channels, regional connectivity and risk governance. Digital distribution, API-based information and supervisory technology connect these proposals to FinTech. The recommendations are policy options informed by comparison, not estimated causal effects. The contribution is a practical framework for translating international institutional experience into testable policy priorities for a small, open financial centre.
Authors
- Ding Ding (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1038-7558)
- Wang Yue
- Fang Angzhen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6624-7988)
Institutions
- Twitter (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of FinTech
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705109926500069
- Primary Topic
- Finance, Markets, and Regulation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00