International Comparison of the Singapore ETF Ecosystem

This paper compares Singapore’s exchange-traded fund (ETF) ecosystem with those of the United States, Mainland China, Hong Kong, Europe, Taiwan and selected ASEAN markets. It treats the ETF market as an institutional ecosystem connecting issuers, authorized participants, market makers, index and data providers, trading and clearing infrastructure, regulation and investor channels. Comparative institutional analysis is organized around autonomy, efficiency, inclusiveness and sustainability: the location and accountability of critical capabilities, the quality and cost of market functioning, investor access, and continuity across market cycles. Dated market statistics and regulatory documents reveal different arrangements for coordinating these functions. For Singapore, recent growth in assets, trading and digital and retirement-channel participation coexists with concentrated exchange trading; these observations do not establish a market-wide liquidity deficit or its causes. The paper develops an ‘openly embedded’ model in which international participation complements locally anchored operational capabilities and supervisory interfaces. It proposes a staged roadmap covering core ETF liquidity, issuer and intermediary capacity, investor channels, regional connectivity and risk governance. Digital distribution, API-based information and supervisory technology connect these proposals to FinTech. The recommendations are policy options informed by comparison, not estimated causal effects. The contribution is a practical framework for translating international institutional experience into testable policy priorities for a small, open financial centre.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of FinTech
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705109926500069
Primary Topic
Finance, Markets, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Comparison of the Singapore ETF Ecosystem

Ding Ding, Wang Yue, Fang Angzhen
The Journal of FinTech
Finance, Markets, and Regulation
article

International Comparison of the Singapore ETF Ecosystem

Ding Ding, Wang Yue, Fang Angzhen
article en

Abstract

This paper compares Singapore’s exchange-traded fund (ETF) ecosystem with those of the United States, Mainland China, Hong Kong, Europe, Taiwan and selected ASEAN markets. It treats the ETF market as an institutional ecosystem connecting issuers, authorized participants, market makers, index and data providers, trading and clearing infrastructure, regulation and investor channels. Comparative institutional analysis is organized around autonomy, efficiency, inclusiveness and sustainability: the location and accountability of critical capabilities, the quality and cost of market functioning, investor access, and continuity across market cycles. Dated market statistics and regulatory documents reveal different arrangements for coordinating these functions. For Singapore, recent growth in assets, trading and digital and retirement-channel participation coexists with concentrated exchange trading; these observations do not establish a market-wide liquidity deficit or its causes. The paper develops an ‘openly embedded’ model in which international participation complements locally anchored operational capabilities and supervisory interfaces. It proposes a staged roadmap covering core ETF liquidity, issuer and intermediary capacity, investor channels, regional connectivity and risk governance. Digital distribution, API-based information and supervisory technology connect these proposals to FinTech. The recommendations are policy options informed by comparison, not estimated causal effects. The contribution is a practical framework for translating international institutional experience into testable policy priorities for a small, open financial centre.

The Journal of FinTech
Twitter (United States) (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Finance, Markets, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.