Perceptual stabilization is weaker in older adults and correlates with spatial suppression of motion

Spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization are two distinct aspects of motion processing that reduce the influence of redundant motion signals to enhance behaviorally relevant motion. Spatial suppression reduces sensitivity to large, uniform background motion, whereas perceptual stabilization compensates for global retinal motion arising from involuntary eye movements during fixation. Although both mechanisms reduce the influence of redundant motion, it remains unclear whether they are behaviorally related. Comparing younger and older adults provides an opportunity to examine this relationship because spatial suppression is known to be weaker in older adults from previous work. If perceptual stabilization relies on similar motion processing as the spatial suppression of motion, it would be expected to be weaker in older adults. To test this prediction, 34 younger adults (aged 19-35 years) and 34 older adults (aged 60-80 years) performed psychophysical tasks measuring spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization. Spatial suppression strength was measured using a motion direction discrimination task, deriving a suppression index from the duration thresholds for a large stimulus presented at high and low contrast. The influence of perceptual stabilization on motion speed discrimination was assessed by comparing conditions that preserved and disrupted stabilization, with the difference quantified as a stabilization index. Across all participants, the suppression index was positively correlated with the stabilization index, demonstrating a relationship between spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization across both age groups. Older adults exhibited weaker spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization than younger adults. To determine whether the reduced perceptual stabilization reflected age differences in fixational eye movements, fixation stability was assessed and did not differ between the groups. Therefore, our findings provide behavioral evidence that the spatial suppression of motion and the perceptual stabilization of fixational eye movements are linked and may reflect shared motion-processing mechanisms that weaken in older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.26.10.15
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptual stabilization is weaker in older adults and correlates with spatial suppression of motion

Allison Maree McKendrick, Andrew J. Anderson, Pooja Nandagopal
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Perceptual stabilization is weaker in older adults and correlates with spatial suppression of motion

Allison Maree McKendrick, Andrew J. Anderson, Pooja Nandagopal
article en

Abstract

Spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization are two distinct aspects of motion processing that reduce the influence of redundant motion signals to enhance behaviorally relevant motion. Spatial suppression reduces sensitivity to large, uniform background motion, whereas perceptual stabilization compensates for global retinal motion arising from involuntary eye movements during fixation. Although both mechanisms reduce the influence of redundant motion, it remains unclear whether they are behaviorally related. Comparing younger and older adults provides an opportunity to examine this relationship because spatial suppression is known to be weaker in older adults from previous work. If perceptual stabilization relies on similar motion processing as the spatial suppression of motion, it would be expected to be weaker in older adults. To test this prediction, 34 younger adults (aged 19-35 years) and 34 older adults (aged 60-80 years) performed psychophysical tasks measuring spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization. Spatial suppression strength was measured using a motion direction discrimination task, deriving a suppression index from the duration thresholds for a large stimulus presented at high and low contrast. The influence of perceptual stabilization on motion speed discrimination was assessed by comparing conditions that preserved and disrupted stabilization, with the difference quantified as a stabilization index. Across all participants, the suppression index was positively correlated with the stabilization index, demonstrating a relationship between spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization across both age groups. Older adults exhibited weaker spatial suppression and perceptual stabilization than younger adults. To determine whether the reduced perceptual stabilization reflected age differences in fixational eye movements, fixation stability was assessed and did not differ between the groups. Therefore, our findings provide behavioral evidence that the spatial suppression of motion and the perceptual stabilization of fixational eye movements are linked and may reflect shared motion-processing mechanisms that weaken in older adults.

Journal of VisionVol. 26(10)
Lions Eye Institute (AU), Twitter (United States) (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.