PROBLEMS OF RENDERING FIGURATIVE UNITS IN LITERARY TRANSLATION

This article examines the lexical-semantic, stylistic, pragmatic, and linguocultural problems associated with rendering figurative units in literary translation. The ways of translating metaphor, simile, epithet, metonymy, personification, phraseological units, and culture-specific images are comparatively analysed on the basis of English and Uzbek material. The study argues that a figurative unit should not be reproduced through simple lexical substitution alone; rather, its core image, emotional and expressive value, textual function, and pragmatic effect on the reader must be taken into account. Issues of equivalence, adequacy, compensation, transformation, functional correspondence, and cultural adaptation are discussed, and the translator’s creative decision-making is shown to be one of the principal factors determining the quality of literary translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HSR (London)
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23371752
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PROBLEMS OF RENDERING FIGURATIVE UNITS IN LITERARY TRANSLATION

Rasulova Gulnoza, Worldly Knowledge Publishing Centre
HSR (London)
Translation Studies and Practices
article

PROBLEMS OF RENDERING FIGURATIVE UNITS IN LITERARY TRANSLATION

Rasulova Gulnoza, Worldly Knowledge Publishing Centre
article en

Abstract

This article examines the lexical-semantic, stylistic, pragmatic, and linguocultural problems associated with rendering figurative units in literary translation. The ways of translating metaphor, simile, epithet, metonymy, personification, phraseological units, and culture-specific images are comparatively analysed on the basis of English and Uzbek material. The study argues that a figurative unit should not be reproduced through simple lexical substitution alone; rather, its core image, emotional and expressive value, textual function, and pragmatic effect on the reader must be taken into account. Issues of equivalence, adequacy, compensation, transformation, functional correspondence, and cultural adaptation are discussed, and the translator’s creative decision-making is shown to be one of the principal factors determining the quality of literary translation.

HSR (London)
World Education (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.