A Comprehensive Review of Biomass Pretreatment Technologies for High-Quality Fuel Production: Emphasis on Washing, Torrefaction, and Combined Approaches

Biomass is an abundant renewable feedstock for combustion, co-firing, gasification, and pyrolysis, but in its raw form, it is a low-grade fuel. Low energy density, high moisture, and high contents of alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEMs) and chlorine drive slagging, fouling, and corrosion in thermal equipment. Pretreatment is therefore required to meet the fuel-quality specifications. This review critically examines biomass pretreatment technologies, including physical, chemical, and biological, and then focuses on the two routes most relevant to solid-fuel upgrading, namely water/solvent washing (leaching) and torrefaction (thermochemical). Washing removes water-soluble and organically bound AAEMs, directly reducing slagging and fouling propensity, but it adds moisture, requires a drying step, and does not increase energy density. Torrefaction raises the higher heating value and carbon contents, lowers oxygen and moisture contents, and improves grindability and hydrophobicity, but the accompanying mass loss concentrates the residual AAEMs, so the treated fuel can retain or worsen its slagging tendency. Because the two methods correct complementary deficiencies, deashing versus deoxygenation and energy densification, this review evaluates the combined washing-torrefaction route as an integrated strategy. The combined route delivers what neither single method achieves alone: high AAEMs removal, increased higher heating value (HHV) and carbon content, reduced oxygen and moisture, and balanced bio-oil and biochar yields in subsequent pyrolysis. The review further compares the methods against the fuel specifications of each end-use, summarises the limited pilot and demonstration-scale evidence, and techno-economic questions that currently keep combined pretreatment at the laboratory stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass6050095
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Review of Biomass Pretreatment Technologies for High-Quality Fuel Production: Emphasis on Washing, Torrefaction, and Combined Approaches

Raju Ahamed, Suneerat Fukuda, Kristoffer K. McKee, Ali Raza
Biomass
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

A Comprehensive Review of Biomass Pretreatment Technologies for High-Quality Fuel Production: Emphasis on Washing, Torrefaction, and Combined Approaches

Raju Ahamed, Suneerat Fukuda, Kristoffer K. McKee, Ali Raza
article en

Abstract

Biomass is an abundant renewable feedstock for combustion, co-firing, gasification, and pyrolysis, but in its raw form, it is a low-grade fuel. Low energy density, high moisture, and high contents of alkali and alkaline earth metals (AAEMs) and chlorine drive slagging, fouling, and corrosion in thermal equipment. Pretreatment is therefore required to meet the fuel-quality specifications. This review critically examines biomass pretreatment technologies, including physical, chemical, and biological, and then focuses on the two routes most relevant to solid-fuel upgrading, namely water/solvent washing (leaching) and torrefaction (thermochemical). Washing removes water-soluble and organically bound AAEMs, directly reducing slagging and fouling propensity, but it adds moisture, requires a drying step, and does not increase energy density. Torrefaction raises the higher heating value and carbon contents, lowers oxygen and moisture contents, and improves grindability and hydrophobicity, but the accompanying mass loss concentrates the residual AAEMs, so the treated fuel can retain or worsen its slagging tendency. Because the two methods correct complementary deficiencies, deashing versus deoxygenation and energy densification, this review evaluates the combined washing-torrefaction route as an integrated strategy. The combined route delivers what neither single method achieves alone: high AAEMs removal, increased higher heating value (HHV) and carbon content, reduced oxygen and moisture, and balanced bio-oil and biochar yields in subsequent pyrolysis. The review further compares the methods against the fuel specifications of each end-use, summarises the limited pilot and demonstration-scale evidence, and techno-economic questions that currently keep combined pretreatment at the laboratory stage.

BiomassVol. 6(5)
Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (TH), Curtin University (AU), National University of Technology (PK), Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (TH), King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (TH)
Responsible consumption and production, Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.