American black bear population abundance on sovereign lands in Penobscot Nation, Maine

Abstract Hunting American black bears ( Ursus americanus ) for the Penobscot Nation, an Indigenous tribe located in Maine, USA, is a regulated process that respects both traditional customs and contemporary wildlife management practices. Each year, the Penobscot Department of Natural Resources (DNR) manages a spring bear hunt on 7 Tribal Trust properties of varying size across the state. The number of hunting permits issued is based on prior harvest data from each area, anecdotal information from hunting guides, and input from tribal members. In July 2020, the Center for Wildlife Studies began a collaborative study with the Penobscot DNR to estimate the abundance of bears in Penobscot Nation lands with the primary goal of developing a robust monitoring protocol to help set quotas for the spring bear hunt in the Penobscot Nation. From 2018–2023, we conducted noninvasive genetic sampling (NGS) in 7 study areas, from which we collected 717 black bear hair samples and identified 151 individual bears (73 F:78 M) using a new suite of genetic markers, from which we created encounter histories from 237 detection events. Our primary objectives were to 1) compare the performance of non‐spatial Huggins mark–recapture and spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) models within small, geographically open study areas; and 2) acquire information on survey‐design limitations and performance to inform recommendations for a robust, collaborative bear monitoring protocol throughout Maine. Across study areas, we found that preharvest Huggins abundance estimates ranged from 35 to 115 bears, whereas SECR estimates of activity centers ranged from 8 to 59 bears. Unlike with Huggins models, we were able to derive estimates for all 7 areas from SECR models, although as expected in some small study areas, the estimated numbers of activity centers were lower than the number of bears detected. Estimates from both classes of models exhibited generally modest precision; however, some were insufficiently precise to permit robust inference. Although the results from this study are valuable for informing bear management on Penobscot Tribal Lands, we caution the use of our results for setting hunting quotas. Instead, we propose a collaborative monitoring program between the Tribes and the State that relies on NGS and a robust SECR design to estimate bear demographic parameters in Maine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wildlife Management
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.70291
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

American black bear population abundance on sovereign lands in Penobscot Nation, Maine

John B. Hopkins, Jeffrey B. Stetz, Benjamin Simpson
Journal of Wildlife Management
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

American black bear population abundance on sovereign lands in Penobscot Nation, Maine

John B. Hopkins, Jeffrey B. Stetz, Benjamin Simpson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Hunting American black bears ( Ursus americanus ) for the Penobscot Nation, an Indigenous tribe located in Maine, USA, is a regulated process that respects both traditional customs and contemporary wildlife management practices. Each year, the Penobscot Department of Natural Resources (DNR) manages a spring bear hunt on 7 Tribal Trust properties of varying size across the state. The number of hunting permits issued is based on prior harvest data from each area, anecdotal information from hunting guides, and input from tribal members. In July 2020, the Center for Wildlife Studies began a collaborative study with the Penobscot DNR to estimate the abundance of bears in Penobscot Nation lands with the primary goal of developing a robust monitoring protocol to help set quotas for the spring bear hunt in the Penobscot Nation. From 2018–2023, we conducted noninvasive genetic sampling (NGS) in 7 study areas, from which we collected 717 black bear hair samples and identified 151 individual bears (73 F:78 M) using a new suite of genetic markers, from which we created encounter histories from 237 detection events. Our primary objectives were to 1) compare the performance of non‐spatial Huggins mark–recapture and spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) models within small, geographically open study areas; and 2) acquire information on survey‐design limitations and performance to inform recommendations for a robust, collaborative bear monitoring protocol throughout Maine. Across study areas, we found that preharvest Huggins abundance estimates ranged from 35 to 115 bears, whereas SECR estimates of activity centers ranged from 8 to 59 bears. Unlike with Huggins models, we were able to derive estimates for all 7 areas from SECR models, although as expected in some small study areas, the estimated numbers of activity centers were lower than the number of bears detected. Estimates from both classes of models exhibited generally modest precision; however, some were insufficiently precise to permit robust inference. Although the results from this study are valuable for informing bear management on Penobscot Tribal Lands, we caution the use of our results for setting hunting quotas. Instead, we propose a collaborative monitoring program between the Tribes and the State that relies on NGS and a robust SECR design to estimate bear demographic parameters in Maine.

Journal of Wildlife Management
Centre For Wildlife Studies (IN)
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.