Institutional setting and vaccine sector capabilities. The cases of Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the urgent need for stable vaccine provision worldwide. This paper examines how three Asian countries developed technological, regulatory, market-enabling, and coordination capabilities for vaccine provision during the COVID-19 crisis, with particular attention to the catalytic role of institutional capacity in reshaping vaccine-sector incentive mechanisms. Using a comparative institutional analysis, the study compares Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on semi-structured interviews and secondary sources, the analysis shows that while COVID-19 acted as a catalyst, outcomes varied significantly across the selected countries because of differences in pre-existing capabilities. The study argues that even during a crisis, institutional transformation remains strongly path-dependent and incremental: crisis arrangements reverted once pressure receded, while those bound by contract or market instruments remained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Public Policy
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2026.2747802
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional setting and vaccine sector capabilities. The cases of Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam

Rahmi Lestari Helmi, Michiko Iizuka, Bertha Vallejo, K. Mita et al.
Journal of Asian Public Policy
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Institutional setting and vaccine sector capabilities. The cases of Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam

Rahmi Lestari Helmi, Michiko Iizuka, Bertha Vallejo, K. Mita, Tran Son Tung
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the urgent need for stable vaccine provision worldwide. This paper examines how three Asian countries developed technological, regulatory, market-enabling, and coordination capabilities for vaccine provision during the COVID-19 crisis, with particular attention to the catalytic role of institutional capacity in reshaping vaccine-sector incentive mechanisms. Using a comparative institutional analysis, the study compares Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on semi-structured interviews and secondary sources, the analysis shows that while COVID-19 acted as a catalyst, outcomes varied significantly across the selected countries because of differences in pre-existing capabilities. The study argues that even during a crisis, institutional transformation remains strongly path-dependent and incremental: crisis arrangements reverted once pressure receded, while those bound by contract or market instruments remained.

Journal of Asian Public Policy
National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (JP), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
Partnerships for the goals, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.