mVOR: A digital health solution for remote assessment of gaze stability in unilateral vestibular dysfunction

Objective To evaluate whether a smartphone-based gaze stabilization test (mVOR) detects unilateral vestibular dysfunction (UVD) compared with computerized gaze stabilization testing. Methods Adults with UVD ( n = 18) and controls ( n = 17) performed horizontal GST using mVOR and a commercially available computerized system. Outcomes were GST threshold (°/s) and lesioned vs non-lesioned differences. Results mVOR detected lower lesioned-side thresholds than non-lesioned (Δ −16.3°/s; p = 0.006) and lower lesioned-side values vs controls (100.9 ± 34.0 vs 142.9 ± 12.5°/s; p < 0.001). Computerized GST showed similar patterns (Δ −8.5°/s; p = 0.042; patients 84.0 ± 23.1 vs controls 111.2 ± 22.6°/s; p = 0.001). Conclusions mVOR differentiated UVD from controls and lesioned from non-lesioned performance, with patterns comparable to those of computerized GST, supporting the feasibility of a scalable assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vestibular Research
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271261494420
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

mVOR: A digital health solution for remote assessment of gaze stability in unilateral vestibular dysfunction

Masud Rabbani, Naveen K. Bansal, Bradley W. Kesser, Jesus D. Gomez et al.
Journal of Vestibular Research
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

mVOR: A digital health solution for remote assessment of gaze stability in unilateral vestibular dysfunction

Masud Rabbani, Naveen K. Bansal, Bradley W. Kesser, Jesus D. Gomez, Adam Thompson‐Harvey, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, Joel A. Goebel, Gia L Oscherwitz, Ryan Stepp, Sean Morgan
article en

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether a smartphone-based gaze stabilization test (mVOR) detects unilateral vestibular dysfunction (UVD) compared with computerized gaze stabilization testing. Methods Adults with UVD ( n = 18) and controls ( n = 17) performed horizontal GST using mVOR and a commercially available computerized system. Outcomes were GST threshold (°/s) and lesioned vs non-lesioned differences. Results mVOR detected lower lesioned-side thresholds than non-lesioned (Δ −16.3°/s; p = 0.006) and lower lesioned-side values vs controls (100.9 ± 34.0 vs 142.9 ± 12.5°/s; p < 0.001). Computerized GST showed similar patterns (Δ −8.5°/s; p = 0.042; patients 84.0 ± 23.1 vs controls 111.2 ± 22.6°/s; p = 0.001). Conclusions mVOR differentiated UVD from controls and lesioned from non-lesioned performance, with patterns comparable to those of computerized GST, supporting the feasibility of a scalable assessment.

Journal of Vestibular Research
Marquette University (US), James Madison University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.