Evolutionary constraint on a core winter proteome across independently cold-adapted PACMAD grasses
Grasses in the Panicoideae, Aristidoideae, Chloridoideae, Micrairoideae, Arundinoideae, and Danthonioideae (PACMAD) clade independently colonized cold environments from warm-climate ancestors, but whether their molecular responses to freezing reflect shared evolutionary solutions or lineage-specific innovations remains poorly understood at the protein level. We used comparative proteomics to test whether protein-level cold responses show stronger cross-species conservation than previously observed at the transcript level. We quantified seasonal rhizome proteomes (winter vs summer) from five PACMAD species grown in a common-garden experiment exposed to sustained sub-zero temperatures, identified differentially abundant proteins, and compared fold-change magnitudes across species using orthogroup-based correlation analyses. We further examined LEA3 protein structure through hydropathy profiling and motif analysis. Shared cold-responsive proteins showed higher cross-species fold-change correlation (ρ = 0.80) than background proteins (ρ = 0.45), despite greater divergence in baseline abundance. This correlation advantage persisted (Δρ = 0.27) after controlling for effect-size selection by comparing shared cold-responsive proteins against magnitude-matched single-species responses. LEA3 was the only ortholog elevated across all five species, with cold-tolerant species containing more tandem 11-mer repeats than the cold-sensitive maize. Two species accumulated multiple LEA3 paralogs, increasing total LEA3 abundance. Independent evolution of freezing tolerance in PACMAD grasses is consistent with evolutionary constraints on protein-level response magnitude, reflecting the retention of an ancestral protective capacity. Structural divergence of LEA3 in maize suggests that transcriptional induction alone does not ensure freezing tolerance; functional protection likely requires intact motif architecture.
Authors
- Charles O. Hale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8119-5273)
- Jingjing Zhai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1535-3103)
- Lara J. Brindisi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0325-5861)
- Edward S. Buckler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3100-371X)
- Sheng‐Kai Hsu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-7163)
- Travis E. Rooney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6301-1570)
- Jian Hua (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3777-3344)
- M. Cinta Romay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-1586)
- Christine M. Gault (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8457-1702)
- Qin Fu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4944-772X)
- Nicholas K. Lepak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-6367)
- Elad Oren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6821-4409)
- Thuy La (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4585-005X)
- Ruthie Angelovici (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5150-0695)
Institutions
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
- University of Missouri (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358458
- Primary Topic
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- Agricultural Research Service