The impact of a nurse navigation program on health, economic and medical outcomes of cancer patients in Saxony – a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients frequently experience complex psychosocial and informational needs that are challenging to address within fragmented healthcare environments, resulting in care inefficiencies and patient distress. Nurse navigation programs aim to provide structured, continuous coordination. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of a nurse navigator program ("Onkolotse") on hospitalization rates, health-related quality of life, psychological burden, and direct hospital costs in Saxony, Germany. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled parallel-group trial across six certified hospital centers, 258 adult cancer patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to an intervention group receiving 12 months of nurse navigator support or a control group receiving standard guideline-based care. The primary endpoint was the 12-month hospitalization rate (≥ 1 additional inpatient stay with at least one overnight stay). Sensitivity analyses evaluated complete cases and alternative deterministic assumptions for missing hospitalization data. Secondary endpoints included anxiety and depression (HADS-D). Exploratory endpoints included health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16), health-related quality of life (SF-36), social support (MOS-SSS), and hospital costs documented by hospital medical controlling. RESULTS: Between October 2017 and December 2022, 258 patients were randomized (intervention: n = 132; control: n = 126). The trial was stopped prematurely following an interim analysis due to slow accrual. In the primary ITT analysis (assuming missing follow-ups as non-hospitalized), the hospitalization rate was 43.9% (58/132; 95% CI [35.3%, 52.8%]) in the intervention group versus 51.6% (65/126; 95% CI [42.5%, 60.6%]) in the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95% CI [0.45, 1.20]; p = 0.219). In the complete-case analysis (n = 192), hospitalization rates were 61.1% (58/95; 95% CI [50.5%, 70.9%]) in the intervention group and 67.0% (65/97; 95% CI [56.7%, 76.2%]) in the control group (OR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.43, 1.40]; p = 0.390). Between-group differences in 12-month HADS-D anxiety change (-0.75, 95% CI [-1.65, 0.15]; p = 0.103) and depression change (-0.56, 95% CI [-1.47, 0.35]; p = 0.225) were not statistically significant. Inpatient hospital costs did not differ significantly between groups (median: 14.224 Euro vs. 12.560 Euro; p = 0.136). CONCLUSION: The nurse navigator intervention did not demonstrate statistically significant reductions in hospitalization rates, psychological burden, or hospital costs in this underpowered trial. Nevertheless, high patient and physician satisfaction and descriptive outcome patterns indicate that nurse navigation may be a relevant supportive care approach for further evaluation in adequately powered studies using comprehensive healthcare utilization or claims data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry name: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00013199. URL: https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00013199/details . Date of registration: 27 October 2017. Furthermore, the study design was published prior to the start of patient enrollment. This took place at the 16th German Congress for Health Services Research (DKVF) on September 26, 2017 [26].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Health Services & Regions
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43999-026-00099-z
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of a nurse navigation program on health, economic and medical outcomes of cancer patients in Saxony – a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

Christine König, Daniela Adolf, Detlef Quietzsch, Ralf Porzig et al.
Research in Health Services & Regions
Cancer survivorship and care
article

The impact of a nurse navigation program on health, economic and medical outcomes of cancer patients in Saxony – a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

Christine König, Daniela Adolf, Detlef Quietzsch, Ralf Porzig, Thomas Heckmann, Jens Schnabel, Ursula G. Froster
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients frequently experience complex psychosocial and informational needs that are challenging to address within fragmented healthcare environments, resulting in care inefficiencies and patient distress. Nurse navigation programs aim to provide structured, continuous coordination. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of a nurse navigator program ("Onkolotse") on hospitalization rates, health-related quality of life, psychological burden, and direct hospital costs in Saxony, Germany. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled parallel-group trial across six certified hospital centers, 258 adult cancer patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to an intervention group receiving 12 months of nurse navigator support or a control group receiving standard guideline-based care. The primary endpoint was the 12-month hospitalization rate (≥ 1 additional inpatient stay with at least one overnight stay). Sensitivity analyses evaluated complete cases and alternative deterministic assumptions for missing hospitalization data. Secondary endpoints included anxiety and depression (HADS-D). Exploratory endpoints included health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16), health-related quality of life (SF-36), social support (MOS-SSS), and hospital costs documented by hospital medical controlling. RESULTS: Between October 2017 and December 2022, 258 patients were randomized (intervention: n = 132; control: n = 126). The trial was stopped prematurely following an interim analysis due to slow accrual. In the primary ITT analysis (assuming missing follow-ups as non-hospitalized), the hospitalization rate was 43.9% (58/132; 95% CI [35.3%, 52.8%]) in the intervention group versus 51.6% (65/126; 95% CI [42.5%, 60.6%]) in the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95% CI [0.45, 1.20]; p = 0.219). In the complete-case analysis (n = 192), hospitalization rates were 61.1% (58/95; 95% CI [50.5%, 70.9%]) in the intervention group and 67.0% (65/97; 95% CI [56.7%, 76.2%]) in the control group (OR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.43, 1.40]; p = 0.390). Between-group differences in 12-month HADS-D anxiety change (-0.75, 95% CI [-1.65, 0.15]; p = 0.103) and depression change (-0.56, 95% CI [-1.47, 0.35]; p = 0.225) were not statistically significant. Inpatient hospital costs did not differ significantly between groups (median: 14.224 Euro vs. 12.560 Euro; p = 0.136). CONCLUSION: The nurse navigator intervention did not demonstrate statistically significant reductions in hospitalization rates, psychological burden, or hospital costs in this underpowered trial. Nevertheless, high patient and physician satisfaction and descriptive outcome patterns indicate that nurse navigation may be a relevant supportive care approach for further evaluation in adequately powered studies using comprehensive healthcare utilization or claims data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registry name: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS). REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00013199. URL: https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00013199/details . Date of registration: 27 October 2017. Furthermore, the study design was published prior to the start of patient enrollment. This took place at the 16th German Congress for Health Services Research (DKVF) on September 26, 2017 [26].

Research in Health Services & RegionsVol. 5(1)
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Medizinische Onkologie (DE), MSD (Germany) (DE), Praxis für Humangenetik (DE), Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie (DE), Sächsische Krebsgesellschaft (DE)
MSD Sharp and Dohme
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.