Why do copper mining projects not fulfil their value proposition? Insights into deviations and causes in the 2015–2022 global portfolio

Abstract The copper industry, driven by the energy transition, is projected to grow significantly in the upcoming decades. This growth requires both the expansion of existing operations and the development of new mining projects. However, new initiatives face a series of challenges during implementation and are often commissioned with significant budget overruns and delays, resulting in substantial economic impacts for all parties involved. This research assesses the fulfilment of the value proposition of greenfield copper mining projects in terms of investment amount, production start date, and scope, for a global portfolio of 80 projects developed between 2015 and 2022. The study combines two complementary approaches: descriptive analysis to identify general trends, and the K-means clustering algorithm to explore non-evident patterns. On average, the projects in the analysed portfolio experienced a 21.1% cost overrun and a 3.3-year delay, both measured against pre-feasibility estimates, with significant variations within the sample associated with factors such as location, scope adjustments, and ownership changes. The clustering analysis identifies three project archetypes with distinct deviation profiles, indicating that deviations arise through more than one pathway. Recurrent drivers of value proposition failure include unresolved community conflicts, environmental permitting challenges, inadequate supporting infrastructure, cost inflation, and financing-related disruptions. As these are embedded in both project-level decisions and broader governance environments, we recommend a multi-scalar approach, combining strengthened pre-investment processes incorporating technical, financial, and socio-political risk management, with robust institutional frameworks for predictable permitting, investment in enabling infrastructure, and adaptable strategies for efficient and mutually beneficial evaluation and approval processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mineral Economics
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-026-00712-0
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why do copper mining projects not fulfil their value proposition? Insights into deviations and causes in the 2015–2022 global portfolio

José Charango Munizaga-Rosas, Nadia Mery, Felipe Sánchez, Emilio Castillo et al.
Mineral Economics
Mining and Resource Management
article

Why do copper mining projects not fulfil their value proposition? Insights into deviations and causes in the 2015–2022 global portfolio

José Charango Munizaga-Rosas, Nadia Mery, Felipe Sánchez, Emilio Castillo, Luis Lagos
article en

Abstract

Abstract The copper industry, driven by the energy transition, is projected to grow significantly in the upcoming decades. This growth requires both the expansion of existing operations and the development of new mining projects. However, new initiatives face a series of challenges during implementation and are often commissioned with significant budget overruns and delays, resulting in substantial economic impacts for all parties involved. This research assesses the fulfilment of the value proposition of greenfield copper mining projects in terms of investment amount, production start date, and scope, for a global portfolio of 80 projects developed between 2015 and 2022. The study combines two complementary approaches: descriptive analysis to identify general trends, and the K-means clustering algorithm to explore non-evident patterns. On average, the projects in the analysed portfolio experienced a 21.1% cost overrun and a 3.3-year delay, both measured against pre-feasibility estimates, with significant variations within the sample associated with factors such as location, scope adjustments, and ownership changes. The clustering analysis identifies three project archetypes with distinct deviation profiles, indicating that deviations arise through more than one pathway. Recurrent drivers of value proposition failure include unresolved community conflicts, environmental permitting challenges, inadequate supporting infrastructure, cost inflation, and financing-related disruptions. As these are embedded in both project-level decisions and broader governance environments, we recommend a multi-scalar approach, combining strengthened pre-investment processes incorporating technical, financial, and socio-political risk management, with robust institutional frameworks for predictable permitting, investment in enabling infrastructure, and adaptable strategies for efficient and mutually beneficial evaluation and approval processes.

Mineral Economics
Montanuniversität Leoben (AT), Advanced Mining Technology Center (CL), University of Chile (CL)
Agenția Națională pentru Cercetare și Dezvoltare, Universidad de Chile, Centro Avanzado de Tecnología para la Minería, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.