When a Threshold Changes Sign: Multilingual Legal Certainty and the Issuance of EU Carbon-Removal Units

European Union carbon-removal certification makes verified physical outcomes contingent on rules governing certified units. Section 2.3.6 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/285 prohibits unit generation in Spanish when total uncertainty is below 20 per cent; its English text prohibits issuance when uncertainty is above that threshold. This contradiction is textual, not evidence of erroneous units. The essay examines the tension between multilingual interpretation, legal certainty, CRCF certification procedures and existing remedies. It proposes a reproducible decision-equivalence check as a specific use of established preventive safeguards, not a new institution or legal duty. The check flags conflicting literal outcomes for qualified legal review before a scheme incorporates a disputed rule into operational instructions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23354182
Primary Topic
Legal Language and Interpretation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

When a Threshold Changes Sign: Multilingual Legal Certainty and the Issuance of EU Carbon-Removal Units

Iñigo de Loyola Arraiza Rivero
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal Language and Interpretation
preprint

When a Threshold Changes Sign: Multilingual Legal Certainty and the Issuance of EU Carbon-Removal Units

Iñigo de Loyola Arraiza Rivero
preprint en

Abstract

European Union carbon-removal certification makes verified physical outcomes contingent on rules governing certified units. Section 2.3.6 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/285 prohibits unit generation in Spanish when total uncertainty is below 20 per cent; its English text prohibits issuance when uncertainty is above that threshold. This contradiction is textual, not evidence of erroneous units. The essay examines the tension between multilingual interpretation, legal certainty, CRCF certification procedures and existing remedies. It proposes a reproducible decision-equivalence check as a specific use of established preventive safeguards, not a new institution or legal duty. The check flags conflicting literal outcomes for qualified legal review before a scheme incorporates a disputed rule into operational instructions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Legal Language and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.