Why Do We Discriminate? Directional Beliefs and Biased Information Processing

Identifying the cause of discrimination is crucial to designing effective policies and to understanding discrimination dynamics. This paper provides a potential link between existing models of taste-based and statistical discrimination by studying directional belief formation through biased information search and processing. By selectively acquiring and processing information, individuals form directional beliefs and consequently discriminate based on these beliefs. Through a series of experiments in which individuals endogenously acquire and process various signals, I document discrimination stemming from directional beliefs and demonstrate important differences in how it manifests compared with taste-based and statistical discrimination. Finally, I show that limiting individuals’ scope to interpret information reduces such discrimination. This paper was accepted by Marie Claire Villeval, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: Financial support from the Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe Experiment Center Frankfurt [Grant 232406], the Interdisciplinary Public Policy Mainz [Grant A2021011], and the Mainzer Wissenschaftsstiftung is gratefully acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.01818 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.01818
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Do We Discriminate? Directional Beliefs and Biased Information Processing

Markus Eyting
Management Science
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Why Do We Discriminate? Directional Beliefs and Biased Information Processing

Markus Eyting
article en

Abstract

Identifying the cause of discrimination is crucial to designing effective policies and to understanding discrimination dynamics. This paper provides a potential link between existing models of taste-based and statistical discrimination by studying directional belief formation through biased information search and processing. By selectively acquiring and processing information, individuals form directional beliefs and consequently discriminate based on these beliefs. Through a series of experiments in which individuals endogenously acquire and process various signals, I document discrimination stemming from directional beliefs and demonstrate important differences in how it manifests compared with taste-based and statistical discrimination. Finally, I show that limiting individuals’ scope to interpret information reduces such discrimination. This paper was accepted by Marie Claire Villeval, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: Financial support from the Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe Experiment Center Frankfurt [Grant 232406], the Interdisciplinary Public Policy Mainz [Grant A2021011], and the Mainzer Wissenschaftsstiftung is gratefully acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.01818 .

Management Science
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.