Predicting Students’ Eligibility for Higher Education from Teachers’ Leadership Behaviors and Students’ Perceived Stress

Little evidence exists on the factors that enable students in upper secondary school to achieve eligibility for higher education. This lack of knowledge limits educators’ and policymakers’ opportunities to identify students who may require additional educational support before graduation. In this study, we apply machine learning to predict students’ eligibility for higher education using survey data from 272 Swedish students in upper secondary school. Our results show that students’ eligibility for higher education can be predicted with an average accuracy of 85.5%. Program type emerged as the strongest predictor, while teacher leadership behaviors and students’ perceived stress also contributed to the prediction model. Among the teacher leadership behaviors, performance-oriented and supportive leadership showed the highest predictive importance. In addition, students’ perceived stress related to the risk of not completing their studies emerged as an important predictor of eligibility. With this study, we extend previous research on predicting educational outcomes by focusing on students’ eligibility for higher education and by integrating theoretically grounded measures of teacher leadership behavior and students’ perceived stress into prediction models. Furthermore, we contribute to the growing discussion on the role of teacher leadership behavior and students’ perceived stress in predicting students’ progression towards higher education and demonstrate the potential of machine learning to support the early identification of students who may require additional educational support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trends in Higher Education
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu5040117
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Students’ Eligibility for Higher Education from Teachers’ Leadership Behaviors and Students’ Perceived Stress

Anna Öqvist, Malin Malmström
Trends in Higher Education
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Predicting Students’ Eligibility for Higher Education from Teachers’ Leadership Behaviors and Students’ Perceived Stress

Anna Öqvist, Malin Malmström
article en

Abstract

Little evidence exists on the factors that enable students in upper secondary school to achieve eligibility for higher education. This lack of knowledge limits educators’ and policymakers’ opportunities to identify students who may require additional educational support before graduation. In this study, we apply machine learning to predict students’ eligibility for higher education using survey data from 272 Swedish students in upper secondary school. Our results show that students’ eligibility for higher education can be predicted with an average accuracy of 85.5%. Program type emerged as the strongest predictor, while teacher leadership behaviors and students’ perceived stress also contributed to the prediction model. Among the teacher leadership behaviors, performance-oriented and supportive leadership showed the highest predictive importance. In addition, students’ perceived stress related to the risk of not completing their studies emerged as an important predictor of eligibility. With this study, we extend previous research on predicting educational outcomes by focusing on students’ eligibility for higher education and by integrating theoretically grounded measures of teacher leadership behavior and students’ perceived stress into prediction models. Furthermore, we contribute to the growing discussion on the role of teacher leadership behavior and students’ perceived stress in predicting students’ progression towards higher education and demonstrate the potential of machine learning to support the early identification of students who may require additional educational support.

Trends in Higher EducationVol. 5(4)
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.