Success at a Cost: Ortega Ortega v. Spain and the Difficult Enforcement of the Principle of Equal Pay

The head of the finance department at a company, responsible for overseeing the payroll, discovered that she had been experiencing pay discrimination for years. Armed with this information, she took her case to the Spanish court. Although she won her equal pay case, she was dismissed for allegedly violating data protection regulations. In the case of Ortega Ortega v. Spain , the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) made its first ruling on an equal pay issue under Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). At the heart of this case is the need for effective protection against discrimination. By upholding her dismissal, the ECtHR determined that the Spanish authorities failed to fulfil their obligation to protect against discrimination. However, the Court did not specify how Spain should fulfil that obligation. The facts of Ortega Ortega v. Spain highlight the challenges individuals face when trying to enforce the prohibition against pay discrimination, underscoring the need for proactive measures. Although the Court did not mandate such measures, its ruling against Spain contributes to the broader effort to combat (pay) discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x261498099
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Success at a Cost: Ortega Ortega v. Spain and the Difficult Enforcement of the Principle of Equal Pay

Sara Vancleef
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

Success at a Cost: Ortega Ortega v. Spain and the Difficult Enforcement of the Principle of Equal Pay

Sara Vancleef
article en

Abstract

The head of the finance department at a company, responsible for overseeing the payroll, discovered that she had been experiencing pay discrimination for years. Armed with this information, she took her case to the Spanish court. Although she won her equal pay case, she was dismissed for allegedly violating data protection regulations. In the case of Ortega Ortega v. Spain , the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) made its first ruling on an equal pay issue under Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). At the heart of this case is the need for effective protection against discrimination. By upholding her dismissal, the ECtHR determined that the Spanish authorities failed to fulfil their obligation to protect against discrimination. However, the Court did not specify how Spain should fulfil that obligation. The facts of Ortega Ortega v. Spain highlight the challenges individuals face when trying to enforce the prohibition against pay discrimination, underscoring the need for proactive measures. Although the Court did not mandate such measures, its ruling against Spain contributes to the broader effort to combat (pay) discrimination.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Hasselt University (BE)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.