Coach learning and club environment shape behaviour towards implementing training load and maturation monitoring practices in UK professional youth football academies

The objective of this study was to explore how UK professional youth football coaches construct knowledge and integrate training load and maturation monitoring into their coaching practice. Eleven experienced (≥5 yrs) coaches working with players in the youth development and/or foundation phase, from a range of elite player performance plan category clubs (1–3), were purposively sampled based on their coaching experience and qualifications. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and coding was carried out using NVivo v12. An inductive, reflexive, thematic analysis was employed to analyse transcripts, and three themes were identified: 1. coach learning, 2. club environment, and 3. coach behaviour. Coaches predominantly constructed their knowledge through formal youth athlete coaching qualifications, sports-related higher education degrees, and informal learning opportunities facilitated within club environments that promoted interdisciplinary collaboration. How coaches learn, and the environments in which they operate, appear to shape behaviour, with effective communication playing a crucial role in supporting decision-making based on monitoring data. Category two and three status coaches reported a lack of human resources, poor knowledge exchange, and limited communication between coaches and sports scientists as a barrier to using training load and maturation monitoring data. Interdisciplinary practices, non-formal continuing professional development programmes and frequent communication facilitated the implementation of monitoring practices within category one clubs. These findings contribute a novel coach-centred perspective by revealing how formal, non-formal, and informal learning experiences shape coaches’ monitoring knowledge, while identifying the environmental conditions and interdisciplinary practices that facilitate or constrain the implementation of training load and maturation monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261496197
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coach learning and club environment shape behaviour towards implementing training load and maturation monitoring practices in UK professional youth football academies

Will Roberts, Jonathan D. Hughes, Mark De Ste Croix, Nathan G Thompson
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Coach learning and club environment shape behaviour towards implementing training load and maturation monitoring practices in UK professional youth football academies

Will Roberts, Jonathan D. Hughes, Mark De Ste Croix, Nathan G Thompson
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore how UK professional youth football coaches construct knowledge and integrate training load and maturation monitoring into their coaching practice. Eleven experienced (≥5 yrs) coaches working with players in the youth development and/or foundation phase, from a range of elite player performance plan category clubs (1–3), were purposively sampled based on their coaching experience and qualifications. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and coding was carried out using NVivo v12. An inductive, reflexive, thematic analysis was employed to analyse transcripts, and three themes were identified: 1. coach learning, 2. club environment, and 3. coach behaviour. Coaches predominantly constructed their knowledge through formal youth athlete coaching qualifications, sports-related higher education degrees, and informal learning opportunities facilitated within club environments that promoted interdisciplinary collaboration. How coaches learn, and the environments in which they operate, appear to shape behaviour, with effective communication playing a crucial role in supporting decision-making based on monitoring data. Category two and three status coaches reported a lack of human resources, poor knowledge exchange, and limited communication between coaches and sports scientists as a barrier to using training load and maturation monitoring data. Interdisciplinary practices, non-formal continuing professional development programmes and frequent communication facilitated the implementation of monitoring practices within category one clubs. These findings contribute a novel coach-centred perspective by revealing how formal, non-formal, and informal learning experiences shape coaches’ monitoring knowledge, while identifying the environmental conditions and interdisciplinary practices that facilitate or constrain the implementation of training load and maturation monitoring.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
University of Gloucestershire (GB), University of Northampton (GB), University of Waikato (NZ), Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.