DNA-Based Biomarkers as Predictors of Carboplatin Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment for Hormone Receptor Positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
PURPOSE: This prospective, randomized neoadjuvant study evaluated DNA-based biomarkers to identify breast cancer patients most likely to benefit from carboplatin (Cb). While Cb improves outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), responses vary, and its role in aggressive hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+BC) remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 187) with early, high-risk, HER2-negative cT2-4 tumors received 12 weekly paclitaxel with or without Cb, followed by four cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Pretreatment tumor whole-exome sequencing was used to calculate the complex arm-wise aberration index (CAAI), loss of heterozygosity (LOH) fraction, and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. RESULTS: For TNBC patients, pathologic complete response (pCR) was obtained in 69% (24/35) with Cb versus 43% (16/37) with control (p = 0.036) whereas 74% (26/35) and 65% (24/37), respectively, acquired either pCR or recidual cancer burden class 1 (RCB 1; p = 0.45). Cb significantly prolonged event-free survival (EFS; p = 0.017). In patients with a low genomic LOH fraction, Cb improved EFS (p = 0.007). Low genomic LOH fraction also indicated an unfavourable prognosis without Cb, confirmed in an independent cohort (n = 67, p = 0.02). For HR+BC patients, pCR was 15% (9/60) with Cb versus 11% (6/55) with control (p = 0.59), but the proportion achieving low residual cancer burden (pCR and RCB 1) increased from 16% (9/55) to 35% (21/60; p = 0.033). Among patients having HR+BC tumors with HRD, 5 of 8 attained pCR with Cb compared with 4 of 47 HRD-negative tumors (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study indicates distinct predictive values of complex DNA-based biomarker analyses for breast-cancer subtypes. Low genomic LOH fraction may identify TNBC patients who benefit most from Cb, while HRD may guide Cb use in HR+BC.
Authors
- Bjørn Naume (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-9476)
- Maria Aanesland Dahle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0692-4984)
- Ole Christian Lingjærde (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-4912)
- Lina Prasmickaite (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-7964)
- Kristin Valborg Reinertsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0433-8589)
- Sigve Nakken (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8468-2050)
- Helle Kristine Skjerven (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3193-5119)
- Hege Giercksky Russnes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8724-1891)
- Arne V. Pladsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7765-6823)
- Olav Engebraaten (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-6957)
- Elin Borgen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-3073)
- Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4797-1600)
- Mads Haugland Haugen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7143-2594)
- Marianne Lislerud Smebye (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8301-7143)
- Hege Oma Ohnstad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6932-0297)
- Eivind Valen Egeland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7273-7277)
- Eivind J. Hovig (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9103-1077)
- Inger Riise Bergheim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3673-9136)
- Anne‐Lise Børresen‐Dale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-9602)
- Ellen Schlichting (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5645-8916)
- Øystein Garred (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8396-031X)
- Erik Wist (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-2450)
- Alexandra Østgaard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0773-0896)
Institutions
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-2212
- Primary Topic
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00